The Supreme Court issued a unanimous, but controversial, decision in May allowing the IRS to summon some bank accounts, records, books, papers and other data, without notice, depriving the subject of the summons the opportunity to object to the seizure of those documents by government officials.<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Listen to "Unanimous Court Limits Taxpayer Privacy - The Supreme Court released the much-anticipated decision in Polselli v. IRS. This case concerned a collection action of the IRS. So, I took a specific" by Today's Tax Talk with Attorney Steven Leahy. <a href="https://t.co/1T4S5sxLia">https://t.co/1T4S5sxLia</a> <a href="https://t.co/PhYUFwbCRL">pic.twitter.com/PhYUFwbCRL</a>— Steven Leahy (@AttorneyLeahy) <a href="https://twitter.com/AttorneyLeahy/status/1659362034771804163?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 19, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><h3>Probable cause</h3>Normally, the IRS must give notice at least <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7609" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">23 days</a> before accounts and records subject to a summons may be examined. In that time, the account or record holder may file a motion to quash the summons if they believe the summons to be unjustified. A bank account owner may object, for example, that there is no “probable cause” for the IRS to seize their records and that the summons therefore violates their Fourth Amendment rights.<blockquote><h3>Amendment IV</h3>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [Emphases added].</blockquote><h3>Exceptions</h3>Congress made an exception to the notice requirement when an account or record holder has already been assessed or judged to have a tax debt. In that case, the person has already had a chance to argue their side and Congress wanted to ease the process whereby the IRS seizes funds or property to satisfy a proven debt. That is, they did not want to afford a tax debtor the opportunity to move funds out of the reach of government before it could locate and seize those funds.Congress extended this notice exception to a summons for accounts and records of even innocent third parties if the summons is “issued in aid of the collection" of a tax debt. The question before the Supreme Court was whether third parties could have their records seized without notice even where the tax debtor has no legal interest in the third party's accounts or business.<h4>You subpoenaed my bank records because I once had a customer who owes money?</h4>In the <a href="https://aboutblaw.com/75Q" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">case</a> before the Supreme Court, the IRS aggressively pursued a debt of $2 million for taxes and penalties that were assessed for 13 years of underpayment. An IRS agent subpoenaed the records of a law firm that represented the debtor, hoping to discover an undisclosed bank account used by the debtor to pay for legal services.&nbsp;When the law firm responded to the IRS that it “did not retain" any records of payments by the debtor, the agent summoned the bank accounts of the law firm and one of their lawyers, directly from their banks, without notifying the law firm, the lawyer or the debtor — essentially a secret subpoena designed to prevent any of the parties from objecting to the records search until it would be too late.<h3>Supremes allow</h3>The law firm and the lawyer, as well as the debtor's wife, whose accounts were also secretly subpoenaed though she was not connected to the IRS debt, objected to the lack of notice, arguing that they had a right to receive notice since the debtor had no interest in their accounts — his name was not on the accounts and he had no ability to withdraw funds from those accounts.The Supreme Court rejected their argument, holding that secret subpoenas may be issued for accounts and records, even where the debtor has no interest in those accounts, if the subpoenaed information may “aid” the IRS in collecting a debt.&nbsp;<h3>In the legislature's hands</h3>The statute allowing searches without notice did not require that the debtor have an interest in the accounts and the Court declined to read one into the statute. If it was the intent of Congress to limit no-notice summonses to accounts partially owned by an IRS debtor, they will have to pass a new law making that clear.<h4>Until then</h4>Kiplinger therefore <a href="https://www.kiplinger.com/taxes/supreme-court-irs-can-secretly-obtain-bank-records" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">warns</a> tax debtors to quickly make a payment arrangement to avoid infringement of privacy of uninvolved relatives.<blockquote>The IRS scored a win at the U.S. Supreme Court that could impact your privacy . . . the IRS can secretly probe your bank records and potentially your relatives’ bank records without notice . . . Given that the agency has significant resources at its disposal (including the power to issue bank summonses) to collect a tax debt that you owe, it’s usually a good idea to pay the IRS taxes you owe on time or as soon as you can.But what if you can’t pay the IRS? The IRS offers options including agreements to pay your taxes within a certain amount of time.</blockquote><div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Supreme Court: Yes, the IRS Can Secretly Obtain Your Bank Records <a href="https://t.co/0u0z5xw1Ua">https://t.co/0u0z5xw1Ua</a>— Mare (@marewho12) <a href="https://twitter.com/marewho12/status/1665439602948075520?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 4, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div><h3>How far does it go?</h3>Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, while agreeing with the court decision allowing an exception to the notice rule even where the tax debtor has no interest in an account, still voiced concern for how broadly this exception could be applied by overzealous IRS agents. She described, in a concurrence, a disturbing, though hypothetical, case where the government might bring its resources down on a totally innocent third party.<blockquote>Imagine, for example, a delinquent taxpayer who routinely visits his local mom-and-pop dry cleaning business. Imagine also that the IRS suspects this delinquent taxpayer sometimes uses credit cards with different names. Under a broad reading of §7609(c)(2)(D)(i), I suppose the IRS could issue a summons to the dry cleaner’s bank with out notice to the dry cleaner, seeking years of the dry cleaner’s financial records.&nbsp;</blockquote>She then concludes that the exception provided by Congress should only be applied on a case-by-case basis.<blockquote>The bottom line is this: As I read the statute, the IRS is not necessarily exempt from notice obligations any time a tax-delinquency matter enters the collection phase.&nbsp;</blockquote>Being that Justice Jackson was not able to prevail on the majority of her colleagues to include that wording in the opinion of the Court, fears have been raised that people only “remotely connected” to a tax debtor will have their accounts raided.<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">“The Supreme Court’s ruling grants the IRS startlingly broad authority to pry into the financial records of people who may be only remotely connected to a delinquent taxpayer...” <a href="https://t.co/xxDQ8VE9fX">https://t.co/xxDQ8VE9fX</a>— The Pug (@thepugnews) <a href="https://twitter.com/thepugnews/status/1660356863278415875?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div><h3>Verdict</h3>The ACLU filed an amicus <a href="https://www.aclu.org/cases/polselli-v-internal-revenue-service?document=ACLU-et-als-Amicus-Brief-in-Support-of-Petitioners#legal-documents" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">brief</a> with the Court specifically warning that accepting the IRS position would make it far too easy for the IRS to claim an exception to the notice requirement.<blockquote>[The IRS's] interpretation allows the IRS to drive a truck through this limited exception and to swallow the remainder of the statute, making notice the exception rather than the rule.&nbsp;</blockquote>The ACLU's position having been rejected, social media has seen an abundance of posts warning of the consequences.<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">IRS Can Secretly Obtain Bank Records of Americans NOT under Investigation, Supreme Court Rules <a href="https://t.co/TF0NNwueKK">https://t.co/TF0NNwueKK</a>— V.Streifel (@streifel_v) <a href="https://twitter.com/streifel_v/status/1660770888797626369?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 22, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div>Posts like the above, claiming that now the “IRS Can Secretly Obtain Bank Records of Americans NOT under Investigation,” are technically correct. The IRS may do so. But not always; not every American can have their records secretly summoned. A more accurate statement would add context:<blockquote>The IRS can secretly obtain bank records of Americans NOT under investigation if they have some connection to a person who has been judged or assessed to have a tax debt.</blockquote>We therefore judge the claim that the IRS can seize bank records without notice as technically true but in need of the above clarification. And yes, business owners should be concerned that their records may be secretly subpoenaed if they enter into transactions with tax debtors, particularly if there are multiple transactions. Close relatives like spouses should consider the possibility of being subject to a secret summons even in the absence of transactions with the debtor.&nbsp;Even Justice Clarence Thomas, a strict constitutionalist, found himself unable to assist the subjects of the secret subpoenas, <a href="https://news.bloombergtax.com/daily-tax-report/justices-mull-need-for-limit-on-irs-power-to-demand-bank-records" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">stating</a> during oral argument, “This is quite a broad statute," leaving business associates and relatives of tax debtors with the sole option of petitioning Congress to amend the law and expressly limit the use of notice exceptions. Till then, claims of secret IRS subpoenas will remain “mostly true.”

iStock-1440589183.jpg

Legal News

US News

Should business owners fear transactions with tax debtors?

Fact Check: Can the IRS secretly seize bank records?

<h2>Move over book burning, hello de-platforming?</h2>Closed out of your Facebook or Instagram account? Maybe your website suddenly disappeared, or your YouTube channel was demonetized or deleted? Perhaps you lost access to thousands of hours of posts and videos you produced, and your years of work were gone in an instant? That's de-platforming; the modern version of book burning, a “punishment” for going against the mainstream narrative. And, the censorship doesn't stop with social media, it includes PayPal accounts and more.<h3>Getting up again</h3>How do individuals who went afoul of the globalists, who didn't keep quiet and let others do their thinking for them, respond when they find themselves de-platformed by social media companies and other services? Here's what London Real's Brian Rose, Americas Frontline Doctor founder Dr. Simone Gold, and independent researcher James Roguski did to pick themselves up and continue their work despite the heavy-handed censorship they experienced.Brian RoseWhen London Real YouTuber Brian Rose publicly began trying to understand COVID-19 and its countermeasures, he soon found his entire life seemingly deleted from the internet by the social media giants.&nbsp;Not only did he lose all his years of work, amounting to thousands of videos which he had uploaded to the internet. He also lost access to his Paypal account, and more, because in his search for the truth about the pandemic; his counter-narrative interviews with David Icke were too dangerous for the globalists to allow. &nbsp;In his below documentary, Rose&nbsp;recounts his experiences and how he ultimately started a channel of his own. He explains that he was wholly unprepared for what happened on May 3, 2020, even though he knew that many would want to stop the interview (@about 3:36):<blockquote>Over the past few weeks, our entire world has been transformed. Everything we took for granted has now been taken away and our freedoms have been replaced with fear. All those rights we fought centuries for have been handed over without a second thought.&nbsp;We all process fear in different ways. I cope by immersing myself in my work and today my job is to ask questions. One million people will be watching and they all want answers.&nbsp;Countless others are trying to stop this from happening. At any moment they can walk through that door or lock this broadcast. I'm scared but I don't know what else to do. I prepared my whole life for a moment like This. But nothing would prepare me for what happened next. . .</blockquote>&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">WATCH THE MOVIE THAT YouTube DOES NOT Want YOU TO SEE (and SHARE IT Far And Wide ) <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/LondonReal?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#LondonReal</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WeWillNotBeSilenced?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WeWillNotBeSilenced</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/StopCensorship?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#StopCensorship</a> <a href="https://t.co/txcVpjPDWz">https://t.co/txcVpjPDWz</a>— Brian Rose, Founder &amp; Host of London Real (@LondonRealTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/LondonRealTV/status/1796285778517221575?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>&nbsp;Dr. Simone GoldDr. Simone Gold, founder of <a href="https://www.aflds.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">America's Frontline Doctors</a>, was one of the first doctors to understand that how she was being told to treat COVID patients wasn't normal. Very alarmed at what was taking place she, along with other doctors, held the “<a href="https://www.whitecoatsummit.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">White Coat Summit</a>” on July 27, 2020, as well as a press conference on the Supreme Court steps. As she tweeted below, the press conference went viral, garnering millions of views before Big Tech and Big Media took the video down.She concluded by explaining their purpose and the result:<blockquote>Our fight was to show America the propaganda vs the truth, and then we were censored.</blockquote>&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Our press conference in front of the Supreme Court on July 27th, 2020 was a turning point in the fight against COVID Tyranny. After 20 million views in 8 hours, Big Tech colluded to wipe the video from online platforms. We knew in this moment that we would win the fight. <a href="https://t.co/9CP0Ogpnfp">pic.twitter.com/9CP0Ogpnfp</a>— Dr. Simone Gold (@drsimonegold) <a href="https://twitter.com/drsimonegold/status/1610416861723729921?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>Dr. Gold continues to <a href="https://aflds.org/about-us" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">advance</a> the mission of America's Frontline Doctors, to protect medical freedom and civil liberties.'James RoguskiIndependent researcher James Roguski who, <a href="http://jamesroguski.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">according</a> to his website, has been calling out lies and propaganda for decades, found years of work gone when the company that hosted most of his websites terminated his account for what they said were “terms of service” violations. It did not deter him from continuing his work, either.<blockquote>They deleted many of my websites, but they ignited my passion to burn even brighter. I now have most of my work on Substack.&nbsp;</blockquote>Roguski is interested in building a holistic alternative to the WHO and <a href="https://jamesroguski.substack.com/about" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">recruits</a> others to join him.<blockquote>The old system is crumbling, and I intend to help speed its demise, but we must build its replacement quickly.If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help , then feel free to contact me directly anytime.</blockquote>&nbsp;The information contained in this article is for educational and information purposes only and is not intended as health, medical, financial or legal advice. Always consult a physician, lawyer or other qualified professional regarding any questions you may have about a medical condition, health objectives, or legal issues.&nbsp;Related articles:<ul><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/covid-sceptics-won-out-globalists-fear-an-increasingly-disbelieving-public" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">'COVID skeptics won out' — Globalists fear an increasingly disbelieving public</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/colorado-governor-signs-off-on-bill-establishing-state-ministry-of-truth-students-atarget-of-new-law">Colorado governor signs off on bill establishing state 'ministry of truth'? Students a target of new law</a></li></ul>

account suspended.jpg

Censorship

Globalism

How three individuals got up again after being de-platformed

Who's afraid of Big Bad Tech? 

A British vigilante group known as the “Blade Runners” is receiving widespread support from British taxpayers as it continues to destroy climate surveillance cameras across London.<h2>The ULEZ mandate</h2>By order of London Mayor Sadiq Khan, the city is peppered with ultra-low emission zones (ULEZs), areas accessible only to low-emission vehicles. Cars that do not meet the city’s environmental standards are charged £12.50 ($16) for entering the ULEZ. Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras positioned around the zones read license plates and check them against the vehicles’ make and model in real time. If a vehicle does not meet the environmental threshold, a fine is levied against the car owner.&nbsp;The ULEZ climate mandate has drawn heavy&nbsp;<a href="https://frontline.news/post/london-hundreds-protest-against-climate-mandates">protests</a> from residents, including&nbsp;<a href="https://frontline.news/post/british-veteran-launches-hunger-strike-as-unrest-grows-over-climate-mandates">hunger strikes</a> and refusals to pay fines. Taxpayers have also taken to disabling the ANPR surveillance cameras which Transport for London (TfL), the city’s transportation department, said will be used both for climate and law enforcement.<h2>Taxpayers cheer the ‘Blade Runners’</h2>Since the climate restrictions were expanded last year, the Blade Runners have taken to disabling and destroying hundreds of cameras. Between April and September 2023, Metropolitan Police recorded 200 reports of cameras being stolen and 595 reports of cameras being vandalized.TfL began placing black boxes around ULEZ camera wirings to protect them from being cut, but taxpayers found other ways to disable the cameras — like removing them completely.<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"> MUST SEE: Blade Runners topple THREE ULEZ cameras in a coordinated strike… The people are fighting back! <a href="https://t.co/Yvr2Xr7Lun">pic.twitter.com/Yvr2Xr7Lun</a>— David Morgan #StayFree (@david_r_morgan) <a href="https://twitter.com/david_r_morgan/status/1802726912050995623?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 17, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>In response, the city&nbsp;<a href="https://frontline.news/post/london-taxpayers-attack-surveillance-vans-in-continued-revolt">deployed</a> mobile surveillance vans mounted with ANPR cameras across London in the hopes of evading attacks, but Blade Runners soon began targeting those as well. Some surveillance vans have been spotted covered in graffiti with their tires slashed, while others have been completely covered in tarp.Last month, 21 cameras were destroyed in the hours after Sadiq Khan was re-elected mayor of London, the&nbsp;Daily Mail&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13538797/Moment-Blade-Runner-uses-power-tool-cut-ULEZ-camera-traffic-light-latest-attack-Sadiq-Khans-hated-scheme.html">reported</a>. Last weekend, Blade Runners used power tools to topple a ULEZ camera and traffic lights to the delight of some fellow taxpayers. In a video that was posted to social media, passing cars can be heard honking in support.The video received over 37,000 likes. Comments on the post were largely supportive, with users writing that, “When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty,” and “Fair play to them, it's a complete scam that does nothing.”Blade Runner Matt Hardy told the&nbsp;Daily Mail&nbsp;that the Blade Runners are “people pissed off about the tyranny reigning over us and getting out and doing things about it – real votes, real boys here.”<h2>‘These cameras are not about the climate. They are about control’</h2>British actor and influencer Laurence Fox said this week he was just given back his electronic devices by police after being arrested earlier this year for cheering on the Blade Runners:<blockquote>These cameras are not about the climate. They are about control. They are the primary infrastructure for all sorts of things that ideologues like the midget dictator [Sadiq Khan] would like to impose upon us.I can now finally say the word ‘Bladerunners’ again. One of the ridiculous restrictions on free speech imposed by the police.It’s a dreadful shame to see so many of these cameras dying suddenly. I’m not at all thrilled about it. Just because I am smiling like a Cheshire Cat, it doesn’t mean that I am over the moon that these scameras continue to topple in high winds.&nbsp;Vive la résistance!</blockquote><div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">POLICE UPDATE Following 6 coppers bursting into my house earlier this year to arrest me for saying how pleased I was that the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ULEZ?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ULEZ</a> scam was meeting such robust resistance, this morning the <a href="https://twitter.com/metpoliceuk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@metpoliceuk</a> were ordered by the magistrate to hand back all my devices, including my…— Laurence Fox (@LozzaFox) <a href="https://twitter.com/LozzaFox/status/1803030521095622912?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div> &nbsp;

ulez sign camera.jpg

Pushback_Resistance

Climate Change

‘Pissed off about the tyranny reigning over us’

British taxpayers cheer vigilante group destroying climate cams

Fisker is filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the electric vehicle (EV) company announced Tuesday.<h2>‘Like other companies in the electric vehicle industry’</h2>“Fisker has made incredible progress since our founding, bringing the Ocean SUV to market twice as fast as expected in the auto industry and making good on our promises to deliver the most sustainable vehicle in the world,” a spokesperson <a href="https://assets.ctfassets.net/cghen8gr8e1n/6W19OiEBJDVIFVEmo4feHA/df902c5cb2b067251a300efb0b35f611/Fisker-Filing-FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">said</a>.The California-based company added it is not the only EV maker that has been struggling to stay in business.“We are proud of our achievements, and we have put thousands of Fisker Ocean SUVs in customers’ hands in both North American [sic] and Europe. But like other companies in the electric vehicle industry, we have faced various market and macroeconomic headwinds that have impacted our ability to operate efficiently. After evaluating all options for our business, we determined that proceeding with a sale of our assets under Chapter 11 is the most viable path forward for the company.”Fisker’s collapse is the latest indication that the EV industry is folding due to sinking demand. Other EV industry players are also cutting their losses as they jump ship.<h2>Hertz</h2>In March, Hertz CEO Stephen Scherr&nbsp;<a href="https://www.motorfinanceonline.com/news/hertz-ceo-resigns-amid-ev-investment-setback/#:~:text=Scherr's%20departure%20coincides%20with%20Hertz's,electric%20vehicle%20(EV)%20rentals">resigned</a> after his bet on EVs cost the car rental giant its biggest quarterly loss since 2020. Hertz had been praised by the Biden administration for its ambition to convert 25% of its fleet to EVs by the end of this year. In January, however, the company announced it would instead be selling its 20,000 EVs — including Teslas — at heavily discounted prices and replacing them with gas-powered cars.<h2>Mercedes-Benz</h2>Mercedes-Benz also recently had to give up its ambition to only sell electric cars by 2030. Instead, EVs are expected to make up only 50% of the German carmaker’s sales over the next decade.<h2>Apple</h2>In February, Apple abandoned its multi-billion dollar effort to create an electric car. Despite being a decade in the works and employing 2,000 people, Project Titan was axed due to falling consumer demand.<h2>Aston Martin</h2>A lack of consumer demand is also partly to blame for Aston Martin&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13138123/Aston-Martin-puts-brakes-new-electric-supercar-2026-bosses-say-drivers-want-engines-throaty-roar.html">placing</a> its battery-operated “supercar” on hold until 2026.“Demand, certainly at an Aston Martin price point, is not what we thought it was going to be two years ago,” said Aston Martin Executive Chairman Lawrence Stroll.&nbsp;<h2>Ford</h2>In December, Ford slashed production of its flagship EV at its assembly plant in Dearborn, Michigan by half. The automaker cut the monthly production quote for the all-electric F-150 Lightning pickup truck from 3,200 units to 1,600 units per month.<h2>Biden administration continues to force EV production</h2>Nevertheless, the Biden administration in March issued new climate mandates aimed at forcing more EV production. The new rules from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contain tight emissions standards that will&nbsp;<a href="https://apnews.com/article/epa-electric-vehicles-emissions-limits-climate-biden-e6d581324af51294048df24269b5d20a">require</a> 56% of new vehicle sales to be fully electric by 2032, with an additional 13% required to be hybrids.

car market decline.jpg

Biden administration continues to force EV production

Electric car company files bankruptcy as EV market folds

For the last two years, British authorities have been testing AI-powered emotion recognition cameras on travelers in train stations, according to recently disclosed documents.<h2>What can the cameras see?</h2>In each of eight train stations around the UK, five to seven cameras or sensors scan the passing crowds. Using AI software from Amazon, the cameras use object recognition algorithms to spot criminal activity, trespassing, weapons, wet floors, overcrowding, and overstuffed trash cans.&nbsp;They can also alert authorities when passengers engage in “unusual behavior,” such as shouting, running, smoking, or skateboarding.&nbsp;A combination of existing cameras and newly installed smart cameras are being used for the surveillance project. All are equipped with Amazon’s Rekognition surveillance system.<h2>Emotional recognition</h2>Through a combination of facial and behavioral analyses, the Rekognition software allows officials to also <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-ai-cameras-emotions-uk-train-passengers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">analyze visitors’ emotions</a>. Internal documents note that the cameras can detect whether a passenger is “happy, sad [or] angry.” They can also recognize passenger satisfaction, which “could be utilized to maximum advertising and retail revenue.”<h2>Anti-social behavior</h2>Authorities can also detect passengers who exhibit “anti-social behaviour,” which&nbsp;<a href="https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/asb/asb/antisocial-behaviour/what-is-antisocial-behaviour/">according</a> to London’s Metropolitan Police Service means “behaviour by a person which causes, or is likely to cause, harassment, alarm or distress to persons not of the same household as the person.”<h2>Social distancing, face masks, and demographics</h2>Other&nbsp;<a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24757655-usecases_dpas_review_managed_stations?responsive=1&amp;title=1">use cases</a> for the surveillance cameras include detecting whether passengers are keeping to social distancing rules and wearing face masks. The cameras can also scan for demographics by identifying people’s age profiles and “socio-economic classification,” which the documents note can create “revenue opportunities for better targeted advertising and product placement.”<h2>‘Quite a concerning step’</h2>The documents were obtained by Big Brother Watch, a civil rights and government watchdog group, in response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request. Network Rail, a body within the Department of Transportation which manages most of the country’s train network, has been overseeing the surveillance project.&nbsp;“The rollout and normalization of AI surveillance in these public spaces, without much consultation and conversation, is quite a concerning step,” Jake Hurfurt, head of research and investigations at Big Brother Watch,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-ai-cameras-emotions-uk-train-passengers/">told</a> Wired.As of now, the surveillance systems do not use facial recognition technology, which analyzes faces and matches them against facial images stored in certain databases.

Fact Check: Can the IRS secretly seize bank records?

Should business owners fear transactions with tax debtors?

Related Articles

Supreme Court deals blow to government censorship

Journalist threatened with jail: ‘For now, I am a free man’

Judge taunts elderly pro-life woman after prison sentence

Groups sue NY attorney general for crackdown on pregnancy centers that 'reverse' the abortion pill

Latest Articles

Who's afraid of Big Bad Tech?

British taxpayers cheer vigilante group destroying climate cams

Electric car company files bankruptcy as EV market folds

UK tests emotion recognition cameras in train stations