By Andrew Barr, Guest Writer&nbsp;On 7th December last year, the Conservative Member of Parliament (MP) Andrew Bridgen asked the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak a question about COVID vaccines during Prime Minister’s Question Time, a weekly event that is attended by the vast majority of the 650 members of the House of Commons. The government body in charge of regulating medicines had just approved the extension of COVID vaccines to children as young as six months old. Bridgen asked Sunak whether, in the light of the many reports of deaths and adverse effects caused by the vaccines, he would overturn this recommendation. Sunak replied that he would not, since the vaccines were ‘safe and effective’. &nbsp;This was not the first time that vaccine harms had been mentioned in Parliament, but it was a subject the government had gone out of its way to avoid discussing.&nbsp;Bridgen followed up a week later by organizing his own parliamentary debate on the subject of vaccine damage, which was attended by maybe half a dozen other MPs. Bridgen made a lengthy speech in which he called for the immediate suspension of the vaccination program. He offered a good deal of evidence to support his case. Replying on behalf of the government, the junior health minister Maria Caulfield did not address the substance of any of Bridgen’s arguments but instead accused him of “deriding doctors, scientists and nurses.” She not only insisted that the vaccines were “safe and effective” but also claimed (without providing any evidence for her assertion) that they had “saved thousands of lives”. &nbsp;By his insistence on talking about vaccine harms, Bridgen was posing a major inconvenience to the government of which he was still nominally a member. He followed up his speech in Parliament with interviews on several alternative media podcasts. Asked in one of them (by James Delingpole) why he had not spoken out about vaccine damage before now, Bridgen explained, “I guess I didn’t want to believe that we were all being lied to; it does change your perspective on the world.” Also, he said he could no longer remain silent now that they had decided to extend the vaccines to babies. He told another interviewer (the Rev. Jamie Franklin) that he believed that he would not be allowed to remain in Parliament much longer, that some means would be found to get rid of him well before the next general election. &nbsp;After the break for Christmas and New Year, on 11th January Bridgen tweeted that an (unnamed) consultant cardiologist had described the COVID vaccine program as “the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.” By lunchtime that day the Conservative Party had responded to Bridgen’s remarks by “removing the whip," which meant that he was now an independent MP and no longer a representative of the Conservative Party. At Prime Minister’s Question Time, Matt Hancock, who had been Health Secretary during the COVID panic and had been personally in charge of the vaccination campaign, asked the Prime Minister about Bridgen’s “disgusting, antisemitic, anti-vax conspiracy theories” which he claimed were “not only deeply offensive but anti-scientific.” Prime Minister Sunak agreed, adding — in an apparent non sequitur — that he was “determined that the scourge of antisemitism is eradicated; it has absolutely no place in our society.” It appeared from their comments that Hancock and Sunak were seeking to conflate antisemitism with criticism of the vaccine programme. &nbsp;As did spokespeople for other political parties. For example, Daisy Cooper, who speaks on health matters for the Liberal Democratic Party, described Bridgen’s comments as "truly revolting" and “dangerous misinformation. Wild conspiracy theories and incredibly offensive comparisons to the Holocaust have no place in British society.”As did spokespeople for Jewish organizations. Karen Pollock, Chief Executive of the Holocaust Educational Trust, stated that she found it “appalling . . . for these horrors to be co-opted by anti-vaxxers.” Mark Gardner, Chief Executive of the Community Security Trust said that Bridgen’s remarks were a “repulsive, hurtful and idiotic comparison to make.”Yet Bridgen had not in fact compared vaccine harms with the Holocaust; what he said was that the vaccination campaign was the biggest crime since the Holocaust. He held up the Holocaust as the ultimate example of the worst crimes perpetrated in the last eighty years. Furthermore, in making his statement Bridgen was quoting the words of an (unnamed) “consultant cardiologist,” and referencing the academic research of a social scientist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem called Josh Guetzkow — an Israeli Jew. Asked about Bridgen’s comments by the Daily Sceptic, Guetzkow replied that he was “surprised” by the outcry, because “there is nothing at all antisemitic about his statement.” &nbsp;One could argue that Bridgen was foolish ever to have mentioned the Holocaust, because it gave his enemies the ammunition with which to shoot him. But it is clear that the accusations of antisemitism were made specifically in order to silence someone who was asking awkward questions about the vaccine program, and to send a message to any other MP who might be thinking of following suit that he too would be smeared and cast out as Bridgen had been. &nbsp;The Bridgen story has been widely reported. As yet, no commentator appears to have noticed, or at least to have mentioned, a very close parallel with the recent history of Britain’s other main political party, the Labour Party, and its suspension of its two most prominent left-wing MPs, Ken Livingstone and Jeremy Corbyn. &nbsp;In 2015, the Labour Party had lost a general election to the Conservatives. Labour had been led into the election by Ed Milliband, a non-practicing Jew, who resigned following the defeat. In the leadership election that followed, the party chose a previously obscure left-wing “backbench” MP, Jeremy Corbyn. This choice surprised a great many people, including Corbyn himself. &nbsp;Corbyn, who might reasonably be described as an “old-school socialist,” became the most left-wing leader of the Labour Party since the Second World War. His election to the leadership caused a great deal of consternation among the mainstream “Blairite” wing of the party. When Tony Blair had been elected Labour leader in 1994 he created a “New Labour” movement explicitly in opposition to Corbyn’s style of old-fashioned socialism that had contributed to Labour’s failure to win a general election for twenty years. “New Labour” was conceived as a kind of Labour-lite that would not scare the middle classes and thus render the party electable. It worked. Under Blair’s leadership, Labour won three successive elections by a large margin.&nbsp;Now in 2015, with the election of Jeremy Corbyn, the socialists had taken back control. Having spent many years struggling to eliminate the “hard left” from the party, the Blairites were not prepared to take this result lying down. They looked for weaknesses that they might be able to exploit. &nbsp;One potential area of weakness was the obsession of many of Corbyn’s supporters on the “hard left” with the cause of the Palestinian people and their opposition to the State of Israel. The advocacy of many Labour left-wingers for the Palestinians, over and above all other marginalized peoples worldwide, was considered by many Jews to be antisemitic, since one definition of “antisemitism” is to hold the State of Israel to higher standards than other countries, to single it out for criticism that is not levied against anyone else. &nbsp;Furthermore, hostility among Labour left-wingers to the State of Israel has spilled over in some cases into hostility towards Jews in general. There is no doubt that many British Jews felt uncomfortable about Corbyn’s leadership of the Labour Party, and that some Jewish MPs suffered antisemitic abuse from party members. &nbsp;Corbyn himself had been careless in the manner in which he had expressed his support for the Palestinian cause, to the extent of having described as his “friends” the Palestinian militant group Hamas and the Lebanon-based Hezbollah — both of which had officially been designated as “terrorist organizations”. &nbsp;Here was a weapon the Blairites could use against Corbyn and his allies. &nbsp;In the spring of 2016, the well-known left-wing Labour MP Ken Livingstone, former Mayor of London, and a long-term associate of Corbyn, appeared on the BBC to defend another MP (Naz Shah) who has been suspended from the Labour Party on account of some remarks she had made about Israel two years earlier, before she became an MP. As part of his defence of Shah, Livingstone claimed that Adolf Hitler had supported Zionism before he “went mad and ended up killing six million Jews.” The suggestion that Hitler had originally supported Zionism is a theory that has found support among a few historians; I would not personally agree with it, but I do not see how it is antisemitic. Nevertheless, Livingstone was asked by the party hierarchy to apologise for his remarks. He refused, saying he was “not sorry for telling the truth.” Livingstone was therefore suspended from the Labour Party. He remained unrepentant. “If you look at what this is all about,” he said, “it is not about antisemitism in the Labour Party. . . . What this is all about is actually the struggle of the embittered old Blairite MPs to try to get rid of Jeremy Corbyn.” Two years later, still under threat of expulsion, Livingstone decided instead to resign from the party of which he had been a member for half a century. &nbsp;Under Corbyn’s leadership, the Labour Party performed much better in the 2017 general election than had been expected. This may well have displeased the Blairites. Until now they had merely been concerned that the party was moving back towards socialism; this might have threatened their control of the organization, but they had no reason to suppose that a campaign on this platform would ever win an election. But now there was the genuine possibility of a Corbyn-led government. Many Blairites felt more threatened by the prospect of a socialist government than by the prospect of a Conservative one. Even more reason to seek to smear Corbyn and his supporters as “antisemites”. &nbsp;In an interview with the left-wing Labour website The Canary, the American Jewish academic Norman Finkelstein (author of The Holocaust Industry) claimed that there was a “criminal cabal trying to oust the democratically elected leader of the Labour Party. . . . The whole British elite has decided that they’re going to use this antisemitism card to stop Jeremy Corbyn and the political insurgency he represents. . . . The problem is, even when you win, you lose. Even if you can prove everything is a lie, there’s always the assumption “where there’s smoke, there must be fire.” But that’s not the bigger problem. The bigger problem is that it’s sucking so much energy from the Corbyn campaign that he can’t talk about his platform. All the headlines are about the antisemitism issue.” &nbsp;The next general election was held in December 2019. It is impossible to say how much effect the question of antisemitism had on the result. But it cannot have helped the Labour Party that several Jewish Labour MPs had resigned before the election because of antisemitism or perceived antisemitism, and were even explicitly encouraging members of the public to vote Conservative. Labour lost by a wide margin. Corbyn announced that he would resign the leadership. &nbsp;In the spring of 2020 a new Labour leadership election was held, and Corbyn was replaced by the mainstream Keir Starmer. In the autumn, the results of an investigation into antisemitism in the Labour Party were published. Corbyn accepted its finding that there was a problem of antisemitism within the Labour Party, but stated, “The scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party.” Starmer responded that those who believed that the issue of antisemitism had been “exaggerated” or was a “factional attack” were also “part of the problem” and “should be nowhere near the Labour Party.” Corbyn was suspended. The Blairites had won. Jeremy Corbyn, like Andrew Bridgen, now sits in Parliament as an independent MP. &nbsp;In the cases of Ken Livingstone and Jeremy Corbyn, just like that of Andrew Bridgen, accusations of antisemitism have been used as a weapon in order to get rid of a prominent politician who was embarrassing his political party for another, completely different reason. Antisemitism has been weaponised.&nbsp;The victims of the weaponization of antisemitism are not limited to politicians whose presence their political parties, or their opponents within these parties, have found to be an inconvenience. The victims also include those Jewish organizations who believe that they are performing a service on behalf of their own community by speaking out to condemn antisemitism wherever they imagine they have found it; who are speaking out against Bridgen, and who spoke out against Corbyn and Livingstone before him. These organizations do not appear to understand that they are being used as patsies by the political establishment. No politician who accuses his rivals of being “antisemitic” has any real interest in combatting antisemitism, in protecting Jewish people from abuse or Jewish communities from threats of violence.&nbsp;It could also be argued that exploiting in this way the long-standing Jewish fear of persecution is in itself a form of antisemitism, since it makes Jews afraid. Incessant stories in the media during the Corbyn leadership suggesting that the Labour Party was full of their enemies made many Jews so fearful of the prospect of a Labour government that they even started thinking about leaving the country. A poll in the Jewish Chronicle in 2018 found that nearly 40% of British Jews would seriously consider emigrating if Corbyn became Prime Minister. &nbsp;Among the general public, the effect of bogus accusations of antisemitism may have the opposite effect. The more noise that is made about supposed antisemitism when a big noise is simply not warranted, the more likely it becomes that people will simply stop listening to you, that when a real antisemitic incident occurs, nobody will pay any attention. The principle of the “boy who cried wolf”. &nbsp;Furthermore, the more that politicians and the mainstream media try to browbeat the public into paying attention to their narrative of antisemitism and “Holocaust denial,” the more members of the public will come to the conclusion that the existence of antisemitism and even the story of the Holocaust are no more than confected narratives, designed for the purpose of silencing debate. In other words, making a noise about antisemitism and Holocaust denial will actually end up by increasing the number of antisemites and Holocaust deniers. I have seen this happen personally, within the “freedom movement”. &nbsp;Maybe this serves the intention of those propagandists who have weaponized antisemitism and Holocaust denial. Maybe they actually want to increase the spread of antisemitism and Holocaust denial, not least within the freedom movement, because then they can accuse all those people who oppose them of being antisemites and Holocaust deniers. Maybe it is all part of a policy of “divide and rule”. &nbsp;The propagandists certainly know that most people, and most politicians are in a difficult position politically if they try to counter these accusations, because they then run the risk of being themselves labelled as "antisemites". &nbsp;Which is where my organization — Jews for Justice — comes into play. We are all Jews, many of whom have lost family members in the Holocaust. Nobody can reasonably accuse us of being antisemitic or denying the Holocaust. We have made it our role to call out fraudulent accusations of antisemitism that seek to exploit the prejudice to which Jews have historically been subjected. It is our job to say, ‘We know what you are up to, and we are not buying it. We will not allow you to hijack our history, and our tragedy, for your own nefarious ends. Not in our name.’&nbsp;Jews for Justice is a group of British Jews committed to the cause of freedom, who meet in person in North London and also on-line on Telegram. Anyone who is interested in joining is welcome to email Andrew Barr at <a href="mailto:jewsforjustice@protonmail.com">jewsforjustice@protonmail.com</a>. &nbsp;Andrew Barr has written books on wine (‘Wine Snobbery’) and on the history of drink (‘Drink: a social history’). He is working on a history of scapegoating, provisionally entitled ‘The Enemy Within’. &nbsp;

iStock-1384557015.jpg

World News

Jews for Justice head calls out 'fraudulent antisemitism accusations that seek to exploit prejudice'

Weaponizing antisemitism

A bill that has been described as “the worst children's health bill ever” has been <a href="https://teachersforchoice.substack.com/p/success-minor-consent-bill-in-albany" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">stricken</a> in Albany, after the Senator who sponsored it, Rachel May, moved to withdraw it from the Senate docket.The bill would have granted children the right to make medical decisions for themselves, without parental involvement, as long as they appeared to comprehend what was involved.&nbsp;Intentionally misleading?The one-line description of Senate Bill S8352 that appears on the <a href="https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S8352" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">NY Senate website</a> states that it:<blockquote>Allows certain minors to consent to certain medical, dental, health, and hospital services.</blockquote>However, there is no evidence in the text of the bill itself that ability to give consent will be confined only to “certain” minors, although many lawmakers poised to vote on the law had allegedly gained the impression that it would only apply to “homeless” children.&nbsp;In an undefined state of emergency, anything goesClicking on the link on the Senate's website to access the entire bill currently leads nowhere, now that the bill has been stricken, but the full text still exists in the internet <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240426230259/https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2023/S8352" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">archive</a>.The bill includes a provision that, in a state of “emergency,” parents may be totally sidelined when it comes to treating their children:<blockquote>Medical, dental, health, and hospital services may be rendered to persons of any age without the consent of a parent, legal guardian or person possessing a lawful order of custody when, in the practitioner's judgment, an emergency exists and the person is in immediate need of medical attention and an attempt to secure consent would result in delay of treatment which would increase the risk to the person's life or health.</blockquote>Nowhere in the bill is an emergency defined. Nor does the bill specify how much of an increased risk will be needed to justify “emergency” treatment.&nbsp;Can minors truly give informed consent?The bill would also seek to place a child in control of his or her health treatment, regardless of any state of emergency:<blockquote>Any person, including a minor, who comprehends the need for, the nature of, and the reasonably foreseeable risks and benefits involved in any contemplated medical, dental, health, and/or hospital services, and any alternatives thereto, may give effective consent to such services for themself, and the consent of no other person shall be necessary.</blockquote>The bill does not describe any mechanism for determining the level of comprehension of the child concerned.&nbsp;Brought to you by the Letter P(fizer)It appears that a large and well-organized public campaign was effective in exerting pressure on New York lawmakers, and many are now celebrating the decision of Senator May to withdraw the bill. However, it seems likely that the bill will resurface next January with different wording.Meanwhile, children continue to be bombarded by messaging that promotes medical interventions such as COVID shots, in the media, in schools, and elsewhere.<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">It's okay to have questions about COVID-19 vaccines for children! Elmo's dad Louie talked to their pediatrician, and learned that Elmo getting vaccinated is the best way to keep him and his whole neighborhood safe and healthy! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CaringForEachOther?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CaringForEachOther</a> <a href="https://t.co/aWkCfysJPE">pic.twitter.com/aWkCfysJPE</a>— Sesame Street (@sesamestreet) <a href="https://twitter.com/sesamestreet/status/1541775926014492672?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 28, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>&nbsp;Teachers tempted to abuse their positionsSo far, efforts to pass legislation to require students in NY schools to receive COVID shots have failed. Many shots are mandated, but not all those that the CDC recommends.At times, pressure on children comes from teachers, especially if they fear that their students will infect them with a dangerous virus. The motives of a New York teacher (with no medical credentials) who administered a COVID shot to a student herself are unclear, but the case illustrated the potential for teachers to abuse their position in the area of health; Laura Parker Russo <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/laura-parker-russo-plea-deal-unauthorized-covid-vaccine-injection-long-island/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">pled guilty</a> to a misdemeanor in a plea bargain and ended up avoiding prison time, despite giving her 17-year-old student a J&amp;J shot without his parents' consent.&nbsp;They want to bring up your childrenIn her State of the State <a href="https://www.amityvillerecord.com/articles/special-report-schools-speak-out-against-states-potential-covid-vaccine-mandate/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Address </a>in January this year, Governor Hochul insisted that,<blockquote>The Legislature makes the determination in consultation with health experts … We're not talking about mandating the COVID vaccine in schools at this time.</blockquote>However, in his speech at a freedom rally in Albany on May 7, 2024, Dr. James Lyons-Weiler of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge insisted that,<blockquote>Their goal is that parents do not have a say over the biological realities of their children.</blockquote>

kid doctor.jpg

Legal News

US News

'The worst children's health bill ever'

NY bill granting minors full power over medical decisions withdrawn. Defeat, or tactical retreat?

If you can't figure it out, ask a computerAs part of their ongoing struggle to be perceived as genuine scientists, psychiatrists are now trying not only to diagnose people with “mental illness” but to actually predict who might be susceptible to “diseases of the brain.” Much attention is currently being given to utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) models by training them to distinguish between people who are “ill” and those who appear ill but are actually not.“Sonia,” who was interviewed for this article, describes what strikes her as odd in this approach.<blockquote>If you’re a psychiatrist and you need an AI model to figure out if someone’s crazy or not, then perhaps you should be looking for a different job. My husband’s been psychotic a few times, and I could see it in his eyes right away.</blockquote>&nbsp;An exact science?Perhaps Sonia is right, but there’s nothing in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM, the psychiatrist’s guide to disease) about “seeing it in the eyes.” One imagines that psychiatrists would be the objects of ridicule if they tried to claim that they diagnosed patients based on such a criterion.Under the heading, “Psychotic Disorders,” the latest edition of the <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519704/table/ch3.t20/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">DSM </a>has a grand total of nine sub-categories. At the top of the list is “schizophrenia.”The characteristic symptoms of schizophrenia are described as:<ol style="list-style-type:decimal;"><li>Delusions</li><li>Hallucinations</li><li>Disorganized speech (e.g. frequent derailment or incoherence)</li><li>Grossly disorganized or catatonic behavior</li><li>Negative symptoms (i.e. diminished emotional expression or involition)</li></ol>A person needs to have two or more of these symptoms for a “significant” portion of the time for at least a month (or less, if “successfully treated”). The exception is when the delusions are defined as “bizarre” or hallucinations consist of a “running commentary on the person’s behavior or thoughts, or two or more voices conversing together.”None of these symptoms can be defined in any established scientific way. Despite decades of talking about neurotransmitters, measuring and observing hormones and brain activity, and experimenting with drugs that play with all of these (as well as so-called genetic markers for schizophrenia), there’s no physical test that can diagnose schizophrenia.&nbsp;Are you a quasi-nutter?More problematically, as a recent paper published in <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2802139?guestAccessKey=d895dae0-ae75-4a87-bbb3-bf067edb2ee8&amp;utm_source=silverchair&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=article_alert-jamapsychiatry&amp;utm_term=mostread&amp;utm_content=olf-widget_05082024&amp;adv=" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">JAMA Psychiatry</a> claimed, plenty of people sometimes experience symptoms one-to-five (and even several of them) without being psychotic.<blockquote>Hallucination-like experiences and delusion-like beliefs are common in individuals without psychoses.</blockquote>How so? The paper (written by Dr. Philip Corlett, an associate professor at the Yale University School of Medicine’s Department of Psychiatry) begins by quoting an early psychiatric text (dating back to 1901) which refers to delusions and the like which are linked to religious experiences. Today, that category has been broadened with the addition of “people who believe in conspiracy theories” who are on the “psychosis continuum,” though not (perhaps) technically psychotic themselves.If madness is a continuum, then psychiatrists can’t be blamed for failing to correctly determine exactly where on that continuum a particular patient lies, so goes the thinking.&nbsp;&nbsp;Most people on the spectrum?Continuums are useful things, and they often come with numbers attached; that is, on a scale of 1 to 100, those between 80 and 100 (for example) can be said to be schizophrenic, those between 60 and 80 are potentially so, and so forth. It turns out that psychiatrists actually have a form of diagnosis based on a numbered continuum — it’s called the “21-Item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15954204/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">PDI</a>).”The PDI is made up of a list of questions on how people view all kinds of issues such as being spied upon, thinking that people can read your mind, feeling that you have a special mission in life, and so forth. The final score a person receives depends not only on what they believe but how distressed they are by it.The JAMA paper describes how the PDI can be used to decide whether or not someone has a “psychotic illness”:<blockquote>People without a psychotic illness endorse a mean (SD) of 7 (4) unusual beliefs compared to 12 (6) in patients with schizophrenia…</blockquote>An SD (standard deviation) of 4, and certainly 6, is huge, and means that there was a huge range of scores in both categories. Indeed, when we look at the raw data in the original study (which was based on 35 questions, later whittled down to 21), we find that “healthy” participants scored between 0 and 31 on the 35-point scale; “deluded” participants scored between 2 and 35 points.And the JAMA paper acknowledges this, admitting in delicious understatement that,<blockquote>… clearly, these ranges overlap…</blockquote>&nbsp;Conspiracy theorists as lab ratsSo, since symptoms of schizophrenia can’t be scientifically determined, brains can’t be analyzed to decide whether someone is psychotic or not, and the 21-Item Inventory produces rather unsatisfactory results, what is a psychiatrist to do if he wants to diagnose accurately?One answer is AI — let the computers figure it out.But AI models have to be trained, and this is where the conspiracy theorist becomes useful. Just as an AI model being taught how to detect a cat against a variety of backgrounds needs to be tested against objects that are very similar to cats but nonetheless not cats, so too the AI psychosis-detection model needs to have “foils” who are very similar to psychotics but nonetheless not psychotic.<blockquote>We would like to suggest that people who believe in conspiracy theories or new religious movements and people who hear voices but do not have clinical diagnoses might serve as adversarial examples to a network trained on the phenomenal features and cognitive and neural mechanisms of psychosis that we have accrued as a field so far.</blockquote>&nbsp;Psychotics in-the-makingAt first glance, this could appear encouraging for those who believe in what psychiatrists define as conspiracies. They’re not psychotic according to this approach. They’re just… something as yet undefined. The JAMA paper suggests that distinguishing between genuine psychotics and conspiracy theorists could reveal what divides them:<blockquote>In this way, we can hone in on the important features that portend illness, disability, and distress, rather than features that are distributed more widely, even in individuals whose experiences closely resemble those of people with schizophrenia.</blockquote>Intriguingly, the author of the paper does not distinguish between people who are ill and those who are not. The distinction is between people who might become ill (“features that portend illness…”) and people who apparently won’t.&nbsp;If you like your conspiracy theory, you can keep it (just don't appear distressed by it)Who are these mysterious people who could become psychotic?&nbsp;According to Yale’s Dr. Corlett, these could be people (conspiracy theorists or others) who are upset by their delusions and find that they make it harder for them to behave normally:<blockquote>These might include people in clinical high-risk studies who do not quite meet the threshold for psychosis risk state but who nevertheless evince some degree of distress and impairment.</blockquote>He would like an AI model to be able to predict whether these people will develop full-blown psychosis or not:<blockquote>Any differential prediction of conversion might impact the ongoing debate regarding the risk state and whether it merely represents an earlier phase of the illness course.</blockquote>&nbsp;Who will get trampled under the inexorable march of psychiatrists' feet?So, while Dr. Corlett admits that “such individuals might be classified as having a psychotic illness when in fact they do not,” he is not content to leave things there. If he (or other psychiatrists, or anyone else) decides that the field of psychiatry needs more scientific backbone and that the continuum theory of psychosis is to be confirmed, he may seek to use conspiracy theorists to “prove” this theory.After all, he states,&nbsp;<blockquote>… individuals with schizotypal dispositions who experience attenuated psychotic symptoms may also provide useful foils as the field of psychiatry joins the inexorable march toward precision approaches driven by machine learning.</blockquote>If psychiatry is to become a precise science, it will be very helpful if psychiatrists can identify people who are likely to become psychotic and predict, based on a pseudo-scientific AI model, that they will become so.In which case, Sonia’s recommendation, if you happen to be a “conspiracy theorist,” is:<blockquote>Stay far away from psychiatry.</blockquote>

protester.jpg

Conspiracy Theory

Psychiatrists want to develop AI models to predict who will become a full-blown schizophrenic. And then?

'Conspiracy theorists' are on the 'psychosis continuum'   —Yale psychiatrist

Story in a flash:<ul><li>The FDA has announced a potential bird flu pandemic of low probability for which it is readying tests, antivirals and vaccines.&nbsp;</li><li>Officials claim bird flu has become transmissible to other animals, particularly cows.</li><li>The announcement comes as the WHO works to push through its pandemic treaty and the U.S. prepares for fall elections.</li><li>The late Dr. Zev Zelenko had explained how his protocol for COVID-19, a single-stranded RNA virus, is an appropriate preventive and therapeutic for other single-stranded RNA viruses.</li><li>Bird flu, first detected in China, became the subject of gain of function research.&nbsp;</li></ul>&nbsp;<h2 style="margin-left:0in;">FDA fear-mongering potential pandemic despite low probability?</h2>In February 2023, the World Health Organization <a href="https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/here-we-go-fda-warns-potential-bird-flu/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">warned</a> about a possible bird flu pandemic. Now, the FDA is sounding an alarm about the potential for such a pandemic, for which it is “drawing up plans to roll out tests, antiviral drugs and vaccines in the event the virus jumps to humans,” as reported by The Gateway Pundit. Even though FDA head Robert Califf says that the probability of this happening is low, they are taking these measures with the rationale that it's best to be prepared for a scenario where the virus jumps to humans.&nbsp;<h3 style="margin-left:0in;">Birds give flu to cows</h3>So far, only one farmer has tested positive for the virus in the United States. He is said to have contracted it after contact with a cow; he suffered from pink eye but did not have any respiratory symptoms. The Daily Mail <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13401215/fda-chief-robert-califf-bird-flu-pandemic-outbreak.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">relates</a> that, "[o]nly two humans in the US have tested positive for bird flu ever, with both being in close contact with animals infected with the virus.<h3 style="margin-left:0in;">Announcement precedes WHO Pandemic Treaty vote and presidential election&nbsp;</h3>The specter of a potential pandemic is being <a href="https://www.who.int/news/item/28-03-2024-who-member-states-agree-to-resume-negotiations-aimed-at-finalizing-the-world-s-first-pandemic-agreement" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">raised</a> at the same time the World Health Organization (WHO) is scrambling to finalize its Pandemic Treaty, to be voted on during the upcoming Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly, beginning 27 May 2024.&nbsp;Vox has <a href="https://www.vox.com/24151110/bird-flu-h5n1-pandemic-treaty-prevention-response" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">expressed</a> concern that the adoption of the Pandemic Treaty is not going so well; author Dylan Scott, who still credits animal to human transmission for COVID-19, states that despite the threat of a bird flu pandemic, “it has become clear the world is downsizing its ambitions for the treaty. In place of firm commitments are vague aspirations.” Extensive media coverage, of a potential new pandemic, just before the vote, could help build support in borderline nations for passage of the treaty.The presidential election will also be held this fall. Could an expected pandemic, even of low probability, herald insistence by state governments for mail-in-ballots, acceptable some two weeks after election day, to “keep people safe,” as happened four years ago with COVID-19?<h2>Gain-of-Function research for bird flu, too?</h2>The BBC <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/future/article/20240425-how-dangerous-is-bird-flu-spread-to-wildlife-and-humans" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">stated</a> that the bird flu was first detected in 1996 in China's southern Guangdong region. A farmed goose was the first bird ever diagnosed with the H5N1 flu strain. The BBC went as far as blaming people for its transmission:<blockquote>Although wild birds have now helped the virus reach far beyond China, "people are the real problem", [Thijs] Kuiken [a comparative pathologist at Erasmus University Medical Centre in the Netherlands] warns. And in particular, humanity's ever-rising demand for farmed meat. (Emphasis added.)</blockquote>The Guardian <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/11/bird-flu-human-transmission-prepared-pandemic" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">added</a> that bird flu has been a silent pandemic over the last four years, moving from birds to animals. And Dr. Peter McCullough <a href="https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/could-avian-h5n1-influenza-be-disease" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wrote In his substack</a> that the NIH and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have funded Gain-of-Function (GOF) research, making the bird flu more contagious.&nbsp;<blockquote>Over a decade ago, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded GOF research that made H5N1 more transmissible&nbsp;</blockquote>McCullough ties the research, in part, to Erasmus University, the home of the aforementioned Kuiken, who declared people the problem in the virus's transmission.&nbsp;<blockquote>One of the primary authors of this dangerous research is Yoshihiro Kawaoka, who is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Tokyo. Another player is Ron Fouchier, working at the Erasmus medical center in the Netherlands. (Emphasis added.)</blockquote><h2 style="margin-left:0in;">Zelenko protocol good for flu</h2>The late Dr. Zev Zelenko explained that his COVID-19 protocol is a general remedy for many viruses including influenza.&nbsp;When COVID-19 hit, Dr. Zelenko repeatedly advocated taking zinc and a zinc ionophore (which helps the zinc enter cells), such as hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, quercetin, or ECGC, to prevent or combat the virus. Zinc is important to the immune system and has been found to inhibit viral replication,Dr. Zelenko explains, in the video below, how zinc ionophores “open a channel, a door, that allows for zinc to go from outside the cell to inside the cell” along with Vitamin C and Vitamin D3 to “create a very powerful immune-boosting nutritional supplement.”&nbsp;&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><script>!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/uzp3gc"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");</script>

<div id="rumble_vowxhh"></div>
<script>
Rumble("play", {"video":"vowxhh","div":"rumble_vowxhh"});</script></div>&nbsp;More than a preventive or therapy for COVID-19, Dr. Zelenko <a href="https://frontline.news/post/cheap-drugs-cheap-nutrients-treat-disease-say-fauci-baric-fda#fnref:8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">found</a> that it was effective for single-stranded RNA viruses, including all strains of COVID, influenza virus, RSV Virus, Ebola Virus, Marburg Virus &amp; Hantavirus. In the video below, shared by his brother Frank Zelenko on X, Dr. Zelenko expressed his belief we could eradicate many health threats using his protocol.&nbsp;<blockquote>I think there may be a solution to all these huge public health and bioterrorist problems all with one simple cheap oral approach. . &nbsp;. . If the whole world had enough high normal levels of vitamin D3 and enogh intracellular zinc we can [sic] eradicate most of these health threats.</blockquote>&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Folks the FDA is literally telling you that they will kill 1 out 4 people in America with an ssRNA virus. My brother Dr Zelenko, gave you the knowledge on how to survive this. If you have this knowledge and you dont share it as hard as possible, then G-d have mercy on your… <a href="https://t.co/AUFOebQDGx">https://t.co/AUFOebQDGx</a> <a href="https://t.co/czWU4Lfxj4">pic.twitter.com/czWU4Lfxj4</a>— Frank (Ephraim) Zelenko (@frank_zelenko) <a href="https://twitter.com/frank_zelenko/status/1788941406041469110?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 10, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>&nbsp;The below advertisement <a href="https://by-julietbonnay.com/2022/01/dr-zev-zelenko-zinc-is-the-bullet-it-kills-the-virus/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">lists</a> the dosages of the recommended supplements, included in his Z-Stack, that he recommended for preventive and therapeutic care:&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/aflds/image/upload/v1715627205/image_d1e0f2979a.png"></figure>&nbsp;<h2>Studies support the use of zinc and zinc ionophores for multiple viruses</h2>A 2010 study, of which Dr. Ralph Baric[fn]Dr. Baric, an epidemiologist, at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, worked on gain-of-function research, and repurposing Remdesivir as a remedy for COVID-19. Remdesivir had been unsuccessful as an Ebola drug since it caused more deaths than Ebola, with liver and kidney failure as adverse effects.[/fn] was a co-author, <a href="https://frontline.news/post/cheap-drugs-cheap-nutrients-treat-disease-say-fauci-baric-fda#fnref:8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">showed</a> that zinc and a zinc-ionophore were effective against COVID and other RNA viruses including influenza:<blockquote>" . . . zinc, along with the zinc-ionophore pyrithione increased the cellular concentration of zinc and effectively impaired the replication of the virus.The study also reported that the combination of zinc with an ionophore is effective against a number of other RNA viruses including poliovirus, influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, and several picornaviruses (which cause respiratory tract infections).</blockquote>Another study referenced by that report was published in September 2020 in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases. The data showed that COVID-19 patients deficient in zinc were more likely to be hospitalized longer and more likely to die.&nbsp;<blockquote>The study data clearly show that a significant number of COVID-19 patients were zinc deficient. These zinc deficient patients developed more complications, and the deficiency was associated with a prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality.</blockquote>A 2022 updated review of quercetin's pharmacological activity, <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731755/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">published</a> in the journal “Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine," lists bird flu, H5N1, as one of the viruses that quercetin inhibits:<blockquote>Quercetin and its derivatives have antiviral effects on a variety of viruses, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), polio virus, respiratory virus, Sindbis virus, Mayar virus, and H5N1 virus&nbsp;</blockquote><h3>Other natural remedies&nbsp;</h3><a href="https://www.healthline.com/health/natural-flu-remedies#rest" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Healthline</a> and <a href="https://www.goodrx.com/well-being/alternative-treatments/flu-natural-home-remedies" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">GoodRx</a> also provide suggestions for natural remedies for the flu, among them rest, keeping hydrated, using essential oils, and taking zinc and Vitamin C. Dr. Axe <a href="https://draxe.com/health/flu-natural-remedies/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">suggests</a> Vitamin C, zinc, Vitamin D3, echinacea, elderberry, and probiotics among other treatments for the flu. However, none of them list a zinc ionophore.Related articles:<ul><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/cheap-drugs-cheap-nutrients-treat-disease-say-fauci-baric-fda#fnref:8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cheap drugs, cheap nutrients treat disease say Fauci, Baric, FDA</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/zelenko-on-next-pandemic-zinc-ionophores-and-zinc-inhibit-all-covid-influenza-rsv-ebola-marburg-hantavirus-strains">Zelenko on next pandemic: Zinc ionophores and zinc inhibit all COVID, influenza, RSV, Ebola, Marburg, hantavirus strains</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/dr-vladimir-zelenko-nominated-for-nobel-peace-prize">Dr. Vladimir Zelenko nominated for Nobel Peace Prize</a>&nbsp;</li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/from-the-brink-of-hospice-with-stage-4-cancer-to-remission-thanks-to-ivermectin">From the brink of hospice with Stage 4 cancer to remission — thanks to ivermectin?</a>&nbsp;</li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/uk-considers-requiring-poultry-owners-to-register-birds-for-public-health">UK considers requiring poultry owners to register birds for ‘public health’</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/suffocate-chickens-with-firehose-foam-federal-agents">'Suffocate chickens with firehose foam' - Feds</a>&nbsp;</li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/delta-farce-public-health-england-report-shows-were-engaged-in-destruction-and-authoritarian-control-of-population-over-respiratory-virus-with-lethality-approximating-seasonal-flu">Delta Farce: Public Health England report shows 'we’re engaged in destruction and authoritarian control of population over respiratory virus with lethality approximating seasonal flu'</a>&nbsp;</li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/flashback-60-minutes-mike-wallace-exposes-1976-swine-flu-pandemic-vaccine-injuries">Flashback: 60 Minutes - Mike Wallace exposes 1976 Swine Flu Pandemic vaccine injuries</a>&nbsp;</li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/university-of-california-mandates-flu-vaccines-for-all-campuses">University of California mandates flu vaccines for all campuses</a></li></ul>

Bird flu.jpg

Medical

The same supplements that inhibit COVID from replicating shown to inhibit bird flu and other viruses

Not to worry! We know how to prevent and treat bird flu - Dr. Zelenko's brother 

Rodent RageYour cat can keep mice out of the house, but you probably didn’t post her on sentry duty around your car.It might not help anyway. Mice—along with rats, foxes, and squirrels—can attack your car, or, more precisely, your car’s wiring, from wherever you park. Rural areas are more affected but urban areas are hardly being spared. Recent <a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/10/eco-friendly-brake-cables-eaten-by-foxes-after-soy-switch/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fox attacks</a> have been noted across the globe.Eddie Mitchell, in suburban England, described a neighborhood of cars under attack by foxes:<blockquote>Everyone around us has been affected. There’s been at least 20 attacks by foxes on the brakes system under cars. One neighbor ended up spending £1,500 on his Jaguar after it was attacked.</blockquote>Sometimes the bulk of the damage is covered by insurance, though the owner will still have to pay a substantial deductible himself.But why is all this happening?&nbsp;Edible wiring?<div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe width="681" height="383" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7FDhkzrucqQ" title="Auto experts share tips on preventing rodents from eating car wires" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>For some 20 years, car manufacturers have been switching from petroleum-based plastic insulation on wiring to soy- or peanut-based insulation. It’s cheaper, though the “climate-conscious” will stress its eco credentials, which haven’t been proven, just as the debate over plastic versus reusable drinking straws still has plenty of adherents on both sides of the argument. Cheaper settles the debate for the manufacturers, however, even if the customer ends up paying the “price.”And it can be a steep price indeed. Rodents attack wiring on speed sensors and anywhere else they can find it, and will also chew through piping, sometimes attracted by the sweet propylene glycol (which will kill them, if they drink enough).Looking for a car without these drawbacks? You’ll be hard-pressed to find one, unless you opt for a model dating back to the twentieth century.There are, of course, various solutions, such as wrapping your car in tarpaulin when it’s not in use; always parking in a rodent-free garage; setting traps; using rodent repellent; and leaving the bonnet open when the car is parked, so that the engine area doesn’t become a cozy nest for furry friends. And it should go without saying that you should never leave food lying around in your car, or wrappers, or spilled sweet drinks.&nbsp;Warning lights flashingDave Albin, who had two cars with thousands of dollars of damage caused by rodents (mostly covered by insurance), set up a <a href="https://www.howtopreventratsfromeatingcarwires.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">website </a>dedicated to this problem; How to Prevent Rats from Eating your Car Wires. His <a href="https://www.howtopreventratsfromeatingcarwires.com/my-story/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">story</a> started on one otherwise uneventful day, when:<blockquote>… I fired up the engine and literally every single warning light is going off: Check Brakes, Check Engine, Check Power Steering…</blockquote>When he took his car to the mechanic and was told that the damage was caused by rats attracted by the soy-based insulation on the car’s wiring, he was shocked and started to investigate.<blockquote>I started emailing and contacting mechanics across the country. The common consensus was that rodent damage in cars has increased exponentially over the last 10 years ... I certainly believe that soy-based wiring has exacerbated this problem.</blockquote>When his second car was attacked, again by rodents, he described how,<blockquote>… the mechanics literally had to take the entire car apart and piece it back together.</blockquote>&nbsp;Hot Chili HondaLeo Horowitz had a more complete surprise—when he took his almost new <a href="https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a21933466/does-your-car-have-wiring-that-rodents-think-is-tasty/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Honda Accord</a> for repairs, the mechanic popped open the hood to find the source of the problem right there.<blockquote>The hood was opened, and there, at the bottom, was a squirrel looking up at me in [its] nest. Apparently the squirrel chewed through the wires as well as the Vehicle Stability Assist wire programming.</blockquote>The repairs cost him $3,600 but, luckily, Honda paid almost the entire sum. Honda has since released a special “<a href="https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-maintenance/how-to-protect-your-car-from-rodents-a5816950285/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wiring tape</a>” covered with oil from hot chili peppers to deter rodents.&nbsp;Nothing new here, move along…But is that all Honda (and other manufacturers) can, and should, do?Last month, a class-action lawsuit against Honda was <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2024/honda-rodent-lawsuit-dismissed-soy-wiring-insulation.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">dismissed</a>, after the judge assessed that the plaintiffs’ had failed to prove that the soy-based insulation made their vehicles defective. Honda (like other manufacturers) never warned purchasers that they had made the switch to soy-based insulation, but proving that the switch exacerbated a known problem of rodents chewing through wires has proven impossible, so far. All class-action suits (and there have been several) have been dismissed; in this case, the judge ruled that the plaintiff’s claim was,<blockquote>… based on nothing more than the age-old problem of rodents gnawing on and damaging various types of materials.Ultimately, plaintiffs failed to uncover any evidence that 'epoxidized soybean oil,' or indeed any 'bio-based' material, was used in the parts of their vehicles that suffered rodent damage.</blockquote>&nbsp;If everyone is doing it, then no one is culpableA previous class-action suit against Toyota, filed by Chimicles and Tikellis LLP, had a similar ending. Attorney Benjamin Johns told media that rodents had caused “substantial damage” to his clients' vehicles,&nbsp;<blockquote>… very costly repairs costing upwards of a thousand dollars. Our position in the lawsuit is that these are materials that Toyota intentionally put in its vehicles and that they should take responsibility.</blockquote>Toyota's response to media at the time was that,<blockquote>While we cannot comment on this litigation, we can say that rodent damage to vehicle wiring occurs across the industry, and the issue is not brand- or model-specific.</blockquote><div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe width="681" height="383" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rCM5LIgIWIU" title="Video: Rodents eating away at car wiring, costing consumers" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>&nbsp;No hope?Dave Alvin, <a href="https://www.howtopreventratsfromeatingcarwires.com/2019/04/23/soy-based-wiring-lawsuits-update/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">summing up</a> the attempts to hold manufacturers to account, presented a gloomy picture:<blockquote>Back in February 2017, there were 6 class action lawsuits that had been filed against multiple different car manufacturers. These lawsuits claimed that the usage of soy based wiring (i.e. wiring that has a soy-based plastic coating covering the wires) is attracting rodents to chew on these wires and therefore, the car manufacturers should cover any damage to these wires by rodents under warranty.Let’s take a look at where each of these lawsuits are now.<ul style="list-style-type:circle;"><li>Albert Heber vs. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. – Dismissed</li><li>Janice Toler vs. Toyota Motor Corporation &amp; Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. –Dismissed</li><li>Daniel Dobbs et al. v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc., – Voluntary Dismissal</li><li>Tsvetelin Tsonev v. Kia Motors America Inc. – Dismissed</li><li>Darla Campbell, Tristin Hibler, and Michael Leppert, et. al., v. Kia Motors America, Inc. – Dismissed</li><li>Michelle Martinez v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc. – Voluntary Dismissal</li></ul>Well, to be honest.. I’m not that surprised. Rodents getting into cars and chewing on wires has been a problem going back decades (i.e. many years prior to soy based wiring entering the scene). So, I could see how it could be difficult in the courts to prove that soy based wiring has increased the problem.Whatever the case may be, all this means for us unlucky folk who have been attacked by the rodents is that the car manufacturers aren’t going to do jack for us and WE need to take matters into our own hands.&nbsp;</blockquote>&nbsp;By “taking matters into our own hands” Alvin means preventative measures, which he then proceeds to outline—one can find instructions on his website.Are there other options?

Squirel.jpg

Climate Change

Rats, mice, and foxes are all making a tasty meal out of your car's innards

Another sacrifice to the eco gods: soy-based car wire insulation

Weaponizing antisemitism

Jews for Justice head calls out 'fraudulent antisemitism accusations that seek to exploit prejudice'

Related Articles

Cuban Regime linked to pro-Hamas campus riots

Soros and Rockefellers fund pro-Hamas 'revolution' on campuses

White House chooses Khamenei over Iranian people, again

Bestiality Taught in Australian School’s “Queer” Sex Class

Latest Articles

NY bill granting minors full power over medical decisions withdrawn. Defeat, or tactical retreat?

'Conspiracy theorists' are on the 'psychosis continuum' —Yale psychiatrist

Not to worry! We know how to prevent and treat bird flu - Dr. Zelenko's brother

Another sacrifice to the eco gods: soy-based car wire insulation