Mirror, mirror on the wall, what’s the safest shot of all?<blockquote>Every week in clinic I make entries into the U.S. CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), as I catch up on years of injuries, disabilities, and deaths that have occurred after [COVID] vaccination.</blockquote>These <a href="https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/annenberg-public-policy-center-undermines?utm_source=post-email-title&amp;publication_id=1119676&amp;post_id=142204098&amp;utm_campaign=email-post-title&amp;isFreemail=true&amp;r=240v19&amp;triedRedirect=true&amp;utm_medium=email" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">words</a> were written by Dr. Peter A. McCullough, who has for years been dealing with the aftermath of the government’s decision to approve the mRNA jabs at “warp speed” before waging a PR campaign to inject the substances into the arms of as many Americans as possible. VAERS, for him, is a tool that could potentially alert people to the dangers associated with the COVID shots. However, for many in the establishment, VAERS is a nuisance, even a danger.VAERS has never lived up to expectations. Ideally, it would allow private individuals, doctors, and vaccine manufacturers to report all the adverse effects they thought, with reasonable justification, might be associated with vaccination. Vaccine manufacturers are actually obligated to report adverse effects they become aware of to VAERS. But <a href="https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-so-many-people-hate-the-vaccine-1d7?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fvaers&amp;utm_medium=reader2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">less than ten percent </a>of adverse events are actually reported.&nbsp;Keeping the masses in the dark, for their own goodThat's still enough to make people like Kathleen Hall Jamieson of the Annenberg Public Policy Center (a Gates Foundation pet project) upset.In an article published last month in <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2815786?guestAccessKey=2b948882-7b40-403b-a550-48550a1788bc&amp;utm_source=silverchair&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=article_alert-jama&amp;utm_term=mostread&amp;utm_content=olf-widget_02292024&amp;adv=004812881201" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">JAMA </a>(the Journal of the American Medical Association) and titled, “Misinformation and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System,” Jamieson and her colleagues honed in on the reason for their misgivings:<blockquote>Vaccine hesitancy is not a new phenomenon ... To fuel vaccine hesitancy, those opposed to vaccination often point to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).</blockquote>&nbsp;Submitting a reportJamieson actually begins by lauding the database: “The power of VAERS,” she writes, “lies in the CDC encouraging everyone, including vaccine production companies, clinicians, and the public, to report any health-related events that occur after vaccination.” When the report concerns a serious adverse event, Jamieson continues, a VAERS contractor will collect “detailed health record data” which are transmitted to the FDA and CDC.&nbsp;&nbsp;"Thanks for the report; we'll handle it from here”This is where the problems with VAERS begin, problems so notorious that they were the subject of an <a href="https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2582" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">article </a>in another prestigious medical journal, the BMJ (British Medical Journal). The BMJ’s author described the frustrating process of trying to file a report of an adverse event, and of people waiting months and even years before getting a response (or never getting one at all), even when the adverse event was serious.Patrick Whelan is a rheumatologist and researcher at the University of California, Los Angeles. In 2022, one of his patients, a seven-year-old boy, went into cardiac arrest following a COVID shot and had to be intubated.Whelan filed a VAERS report and waited to be contacted by the CDC, given the seriousness of the event.“I assumed that, since it was a catastrophic event, the safety committee would want to hear about it right away,” he said. But nobody called.A week later, Whelan had to update the report. Tragically, there had been no improvement in the boy’s condition and the family decided to terminate life support. When Whelan tried to update, however, he found that it wasn't an option; instead, he had to file a new report, of his patient's death.And still no one from the FDA or CDC contacted him.Inability to update reports (which can often create the skewed impression that a serious case resolved itself when in fact the person concerned died) is not a bug in VAERS—it’s by design, as the FDA claims that case updates and corrections must be made and kept on the backend of the system in order to “protect patient confidentiality.” FAERS—the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System—however, which collects reports on drugs rather than vaccines, can be updated, with no such concerns about patient confidentiality.&nbsp;The (ab)uses of VAERS dataEven the best clinical trials can only enroll so many people. So with virtually an entire population of millions effectively part of a huge experiment in mRNA “vaccines,” one might have thought the resulting information provided by the subjects themselves would present a gold mine of data for scientists keen to know how things were working out in such a novel field. Jamieson seems to suggest that this actually happened, writing that VAERS<blockquote>has proved to be a useful surveillance system for health care globally, when combined with robust, well-designed studies to understand if there is a causal relationship between a vaccine and a subsequent diagnosis.</blockquote>Possibly this has been the case with other vaccines. With the mRNA shots, however, <a href="https://openvaers.com/faq/how-to-calculate-the-urf-using-v-safe-and-vaers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">less than four percent</a> of people who experienced a serious medical event following a shot were contacted for further information.Furthermore, the CDC, as of November 2023, had only reviewed 20,000 reports (out of millions). Interestingly, it determined that not a single death was linked to the mRNA shots. Jamieson appears to believe this is an accurate assessment—she writes scathingly of an Instagram video (since taken down) featuring a person pointing to a VAERS report and saying, “Acute myocardial infarction. That is a stroke, if you guys aren’t aware of what that means.” Jamieson then specifically attacks the social media user for making the “implication” that the jabs are causing deaths:<blockquote>She proceeded to scroll through dozens of reported postvaccination deaths as she noted,&nbsp;“Look at all these deaths you guys.”&nbsp;The implication: COVID-19 vaccination caused the strokes and deaths.</blockquote>&nbsp;Why don’t they trust vaccines anymore? Must be VAERSFiling a false report to VAERS is a criminal offense that can land a person in prison for up to five years. Even physicians and scientists find the process complex and time-consuming—and even they sometimes have their reports challenged by the CDC, despite providing full documentation. Jamieson, nonetheless, asserts that serious adverse events are significantly over-reported to VAERS, and that the entire concept of the database is one huge invitation for bad agents to engage in misinformation.The crux of her concern is her view that most people simply can't understand what VAERS is.<blockquote>Access to VAERS reports without understanding their role in surveillance may diminish trust in scientists or, worse, seed misinformation … and allowing full access to unvetted language increases public susceptibility to misconceptions about vaccine safety.”... In the prepandemic era, attention to data such as that publicly available through VAERS was limited to a minority of the public. However, since the pandemic, a rapid growth of information has occurred from global sources available in the public domain. [Emphases added]</blockquote>&nbsp;Two different solutionsThe VAERS <a href="https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">site </a>already prominently features a warning that “VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness.” So what is Jamieson to do, given that many members of the public persist in believing that the data, however imperfect, do actually signify something?She comes up with an interesting solution: Rename VAERS.<blockquote>How can we improve the public’s understanding of vaccine surveillance reports and their significance or lack thereof? A simple first step might be to change the name of this system from the “Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System” to one that more accurately describes its purpose.&nbsp;</blockquote>What is VAERS’ purpose?<blockquote>For example, in our opinion, reterming the system “Vaccine Safety Sentinel” would remind audiences that the incidents of concern are unverified, related to safety, and part of a monitoring or early-warning system. Adding “safety” to the title would align the system with others in the CDC, “v-safe” notable among them, that include “safe” or “safety” in their name ... “Safety” reinforces the monitoring system’s goal: protecting those who have been vaccinated. [Emphases added]</blockquote>Possibly there’s a better solution. How about creating a more robust version of VAERS with data considered reliable? Well, that was already tried in the past, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reveals in his book, The Real Anthony Fauci:<blockquote>In 2010, the federal Agency for Health Care Research Quality (AHRQ) designed and field-tested a state-of-the-art machine-counting (AI) system as an efficient alternative to VAERS. By testing the system for several years on the Harvard Pilgrim HMO, AHRQ proved that it could capture most vaccine injuries. AHRQ initially planned to roll out the system to all remaining HMOs, but after seeing the AHRQ’s frightening results—vaccines were causing serious injuries in 1 of every 40 recipients—CDC killed the project and stowed the new system on a dusty shelf.&nbsp;</blockquote>

jab.jpg

Vaccine Injury

US News

Medical

Gates-funded policy center seeks to undermine the experiences of millions, rename VAERS as Vaccine Safety Sentinel 

Mirror, mirror on the wall, what’s the safest shot of all?

<h2>Move over book burning, hello de-platforming?</h2>Closed out of your Facebook or Instagram account? Maybe your website suddenly disappeared, or your YouTube channel was demonetized or deleted? Perhaps you lost access to thousands of hours of posts and videos you produced, and your years of work were gone in an instant? That's de-platforming; the modern version of book burning, a “punishment” for going against the mainstream narrative. And, the censorship doesn't stop with social media, it includes PayPal accounts and more.<h3>Getting up again</h3>How do individuals who went afoul of the globalists, who didn't keep quiet and let others do their thinking for them, respond when they find themselves de-platformed by social media companies and other services? Here's what London Real's Brian Rose, Americas Frontline Doctor founder Dr. Simone Gold, and independent researcher James Roguski did to pick themselves up and continue their work despite the heavy-handed censorship they experienced.Brian RoseWhen London Real YouTuber Brian Rose publicly began trying to understand COVID-19 and its countermeasures, he soon found his entire life seemingly deleted from the internet by the social media giants.&nbsp;Not only did he lose all his years of work, amounting to thousands of videos which he had uploaded to the internet. He also lost access to his Paypal account, and more, because in his search for the truth about the pandemic; his counter-narrative interviews with David Icke were too dangerous for the globalists to allow. &nbsp;In his below documentary, Rose&nbsp;recounts his experiences and how he ultimately started a channel of his own. He explains that he was wholly unprepared for what happened on May 3, 2020, even though he knew that many would want to stop the interview (@about 3:36):<blockquote>Over the past few weeks, our entire world has been transformed. Everything we took for granted has now been taken away and our freedoms have been replaced with fear. All those rights we fought centuries for have been handed over without a second thought.&nbsp;We all process fear in different ways. I cope by immersing myself in my work and today my job is to ask questions. One million people will be watching and they all want answers.&nbsp;Countless others are trying to stop this from happening. At any moment they can walk through that door or lock this broadcast. I'm scared but I don't know what else to do. I prepared my whole life for a moment like This. But nothing would prepare me for what happened next. . .</blockquote>&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">WATCH THE MOVIE THAT YouTube DOES NOT Want YOU TO SEE (and SHARE IT Far And Wide ) <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/LondonReal?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#LondonReal</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WeWillNotBeSilenced?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WeWillNotBeSilenced</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/StopCensorship?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#StopCensorship</a> <a href="https://t.co/txcVpjPDWz">https://t.co/txcVpjPDWz</a>— Brian Rose, Founder &amp; Host of London Real (@LondonRealTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/LondonRealTV/status/1796285778517221575?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>&nbsp;Dr. Simone GoldDr. Simone Gold, founder of <a href="https://www.aflds.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">America's Frontline Doctors</a>, was one of the first doctors to understand that how she was being told to treat COVID patients wasn't normal. Very alarmed at what was taking place she, along with other doctors, held the “<a href="https://www.whitecoatsummit.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">White Coat Summit</a>” on July 27, 2020, as well as a press conference on the Supreme Court steps. As she tweeted below, the press conference went viral, garnering millions of views before Big Tech and Big Media took the video down.She concluded by explaining their purpose and the result:<blockquote>Our fight was to show America the propaganda vs the truth, and then we were censored.</blockquote>&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Our press conference in front of the Supreme Court on July 27th, 2020 was a turning point in the fight against COVID Tyranny. After 20 million views in 8 hours, Big Tech colluded to wipe the video from online platforms. We knew in this moment that we would win the fight. <a href="https://t.co/9CP0Ogpnfp">pic.twitter.com/9CP0Ogpnfp</a>— Dr. Simone Gold (@drsimonegold) <a href="https://twitter.com/drsimonegold/status/1610416861723729921?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>Dr. Gold continues to <a href="https://aflds.org/about-us" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">advance</a> the mission of America's Frontline Doctors, to protect medical freedom and civil liberties.'James RoguskiIndependent researcher James Roguski who, <a href="http://jamesroguski.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">according</a> to his website, has been calling out lies and propaganda for decades, found years of work gone when the company that hosted most of his websites terminated his account for what they said were “terms of service” violations. It did not deter him from continuing his work, either.<blockquote>They deleted many of my websites, but they ignited my passion to burn even brighter. I now have most of my work on Substack.&nbsp;</blockquote>Roguski is interested in building a holistic alternative to the WHO and <a href="https://jamesroguski.substack.com/about" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">recruits</a> others to join him.<blockquote>The old system is crumbling, and I intend to help speed its demise, but we must build its replacement quickly.If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help , then feel free to contact me directly anytime.</blockquote>&nbsp;The information contained in this article is for educational and information purposes only and is not intended as health, medical, financial or legal advice. Always consult a physician, lawyer or other qualified professional regarding any questions you may have about a medical condition, health objectives, or legal issues.&nbsp;Related articles:<ul><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/covid-sceptics-won-out-globalists-fear-an-increasingly-disbelieving-public" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">'COVID skeptics won out' — Globalists fear an increasingly disbelieving public</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/colorado-governor-signs-off-on-bill-establishing-state-ministry-of-truth-students-atarget-of-new-law">Colorado governor signs off on bill establishing state 'ministry of truth'? Students a target of new law</a></li></ul>

account suspended.jpg

Censorship

Globalism

How three individuals got up again after being de-platformed

Who's afraid of Big Bad Tech? 

A British vigilante group known as the “Blade Runners” is receiving widespread support from British taxpayers as it continues to destroy climate surveillance cameras across London.<h2>The ULEZ mandate</h2>By order of London Mayor Sadiq Khan, the city is peppered with ultra-low emission zones (ULEZs), areas accessible only to low-emission vehicles. Cars that do not meet the city’s environmental standards are charged £12.50 ($16) for entering the ULEZ. Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras positioned around the zones read license plates and check them against the vehicles’ make and model in real time. If a vehicle does not meet the environmental threshold, a fine is levied against the car owner.&nbsp;The ULEZ climate mandate has drawn heavy&nbsp;<a href="https://frontline.news/post/london-hundreds-protest-against-climate-mandates">protests</a> from residents, including&nbsp;<a href="https://frontline.news/post/british-veteran-launches-hunger-strike-as-unrest-grows-over-climate-mandates">hunger strikes</a> and refusals to pay fines. Taxpayers have also taken to disabling the ANPR surveillance cameras which Transport for London (TfL), the city’s transportation department, said will be used both for climate and law enforcement.<h2>Taxpayers cheer the ‘Blade Runners’</h2>Since the climate restrictions were expanded last year, the Blade Runners have taken to disabling and destroying hundreds of cameras. Between April and September 2023, Metropolitan Police recorded 200 reports of cameras being stolen and 595 reports of cameras being vandalized.TfL began placing black boxes around ULEZ camera wirings to protect them from being cut, but taxpayers found other ways to disable the cameras — like removing them completely.<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"> MUST SEE: Blade Runners topple THREE ULEZ cameras in a coordinated strike… The people are fighting back! <a href="https://t.co/Yvr2Xr7Lun">pic.twitter.com/Yvr2Xr7Lun</a>— David Morgan #StayFree (@david_r_morgan) <a href="https://twitter.com/david_r_morgan/status/1802726912050995623?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 17, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>In response, the city&nbsp;<a href="https://frontline.news/post/london-taxpayers-attack-surveillance-vans-in-continued-revolt">deployed</a> mobile surveillance vans mounted with ANPR cameras across London in the hopes of evading attacks, but Blade Runners soon began targeting those as well. Some surveillance vans have been spotted covered in graffiti with their tires slashed, while others have been completely covered in tarp.Last month, 21 cameras were destroyed in the hours after Sadiq Khan was re-elected mayor of London, the&nbsp;Daily Mail&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13538797/Moment-Blade-Runner-uses-power-tool-cut-ULEZ-camera-traffic-light-latest-attack-Sadiq-Khans-hated-scheme.html">reported</a>. Last weekend, Blade Runners used power tools to topple a ULEZ camera and traffic lights to the delight of some fellow taxpayers. In a video that was posted to social media, passing cars can be heard honking in support.The video received over 37,000 likes. Comments on the post were largely supportive, with users writing that, “When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty,” and “Fair play to them, it's a complete scam that does nothing.”Blade Runner Matt Hardy told the&nbsp;Daily Mail&nbsp;that the Blade Runners are “people pissed off about the tyranny reigning over us and getting out and doing things about it – real votes, real boys here.”<h2>‘These cameras are not about the climate. They are about control’</h2>British actor and influencer Laurence Fox said this week he was just given back his electronic devices by police after being arrested earlier this year for cheering on the Blade Runners:<blockquote>These cameras are not about the climate. They are about control. They are the primary infrastructure for all sorts of things that ideologues like the midget dictator [Sadiq Khan] would like to impose upon us.I can now finally say the word ‘Bladerunners’ again. One of the ridiculous restrictions on free speech imposed by the police.It’s a dreadful shame to see so many of these cameras dying suddenly. I’m not at all thrilled about it. Just because I am smiling like a Cheshire Cat, it doesn’t mean that I am over the moon that these scameras continue to topple in high winds.&nbsp;Vive la résistance!</blockquote><div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">POLICE UPDATE Following 6 coppers bursting into my house earlier this year to arrest me for saying how pleased I was that the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ULEZ?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ULEZ</a> scam was meeting such robust resistance, this morning the <a href="https://twitter.com/metpoliceuk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@metpoliceuk</a> were ordered by the magistrate to hand back all my devices, including my…— Laurence Fox (@LozzaFox) <a href="https://twitter.com/LozzaFox/status/1803030521095622912?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div> &nbsp;

ulez sign camera.jpg

Pushback_Resistance

Climate Change

‘Pissed off about the tyranny reigning over us’

British taxpayers cheer vigilante group destroying climate cams

Fisker is filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the electric vehicle (EV) company announced Tuesday.<h2>‘Like other companies in the electric vehicle industry’</h2>“Fisker has made incredible progress since our founding, bringing the Ocean SUV to market twice as fast as expected in the auto industry and making good on our promises to deliver the most sustainable vehicle in the world,” a spokesperson <a href="https://assets.ctfassets.net/cghen8gr8e1n/6W19OiEBJDVIFVEmo4feHA/df902c5cb2b067251a300efb0b35f611/Fisker-Filing-FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">said</a>.The California-based company added it is not the only EV maker that has been struggling to stay in business.“We are proud of our achievements, and we have put thousands of Fisker Ocean SUVs in customers’ hands in both North American [sic] and Europe. But like other companies in the electric vehicle industry, we have faced various market and macroeconomic headwinds that have impacted our ability to operate efficiently. After evaluating all options for our business, we determined that proceeding with a sale of our assets under Chapter 11 is the most viable path forward for the company.”Fisker’s collapse is the latest indication that the EV industry is folding due to sinking demand. Other EV industry players are also cutting their losses as they jump ship.<h2>Hertz</h2>In March, Hertz CEO Stephen Scherr&nbsp;<a href="https://www.motorfinanceonline.com/news/hertz-ceo-resigns-amid-ev-investment-setback/#:~:text=Scherr's%20departure%20coincides%20with%20Hertz's,electric%20vehicle%20(EV)%20rentals">resigned</a> after his bet on EVs cost the car rental giant its biggest quarterly loss since 2020. Hertz had been praised by the Biden administration for its ambition to convert 25% of its fleet to EVs by the end of this year. In January, however, the company announced it would instead be selling its 20,000 EVs — including Teslas — at heavily discounted prices and replacing them with gas-powered cars.<h2>Mercedes-Benz</h2>Mercedes-Benz also recently had to give up its ambition to only sell electric cars by 2030. Instead, EVs are expected to make up only 50% of the German carmaker’s sales over the next decade.<h2>Apple</h2>In February, Apple abandoned its multi-billion dollar effort to create an electric car. Despite being a decade in the works and employing 2,000 people, Project Titan was axed due to falling consumer demand.<h2>Aston Martin</h2>A lack of consumer demand is also partly to blame for Aston Martin&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13138123/Aston-Martin-puts-brakes-new-electric-supercar-2026-bosses-say-drivers-want-engines-throaty-roar.html">placing</a> its battery-operated “supercar” on hold until 2026.“Demand, certainly at an Aston Martin price point, is not what we thought it was going to be two years ago,” said Aston Martin Executive Chairman Lawrence Stroll.&nbsp;<h2>Ford</h2>In December, Ford slashed production of its flagship EV at its assembly plant in Dearborn, Michigan by half. The automaker cut the monthly production quote for the all-electric F-150 Lightning pickup truck from 3,200 units to 1,600 units per month.<h2>Biden administration continues to force EV production</h2>Nevertheless, the Biden administration in March issued new climate mandates aimed at forcing more EV production. The new rules from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contain tight emissions standards that will&nbsp;<a href="https://apnews.com/article/epa-electric-vehicles-emissions-limits-climate-biden-e6d581324af51294048df24269b5d20a">require</a> 56% of new vehicle sales to be fully electric by 2032, with an additional 13% required to be hybrids.

car market decline.jpg

Biden administration continues to force EV production

Electric car company files bankruptcy as EV market folds

For the last two years, British authorities have been testing AI-powered emotion recognition cameras on travelers in train stations, according to recently disclosed documents.<h2>What can the cameras see?</h2>In each of eight train stations around the UK, five to seven cameras or sensors scan the passing crowds. Using AI software from Amazon, the cameras use object recognition algorithms to spot criminal activity, trespassing, weapons, wet floors, overcrowding, and overstuffed trash cans.&nbsp;They can also alert authorities when passengers engage in “unusual behavior,” such as shouting, running, smoking, or skateboarding.&nbsp;A combination of existing cameras and newly installed smart cameras are being used for the surveillance project. All are equipped with Amazon’s Rekognition surveillance system.<h2>Emotional recognition</h2>Through a combination of facial and behavioral analyses, the Rekognition software allows officials to also <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-ai-cameras-emotions-uk-train-passengers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">analyze visitors’ emotions</a>. Internal documents note that the cameras can detect whether a passenger is “happy, sad [or] angry.” They can also recognize passenger satisfaction, which “could be utilized to maximum advertising and retail revenue.”<h2>Anti-social behavior</h2>Authorities can also detect passengers who exhibit “anti-social behaviour,” which&nbsp;<a href="https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/asb/asb/antisocial-behaviour/what-is-antisocial-behaviour/">according</a> to London’s Metropolitan Police Service means “behaviour by a person which causes, or is likely to cause, harassment, alarm or distress to persons not of the same household as the person.”<h2>Social distancing, face masks, and demographics</h2>Other&nbsp;<a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24757655-usecases_dpas_review_managed_stations?responsive=1&amp;title=1">use cases</a> for the surveillance cameras include detecting whether passengers are keeping to social distancing rules and wearing face masks. The cameras can also scan for demographics by identifying people’s age profiles and “socio-economic classification,” which the documents note can create “revenue opportunities for better targeted advertising and product placement.”<h2>‘Quite a concerning step’</h2>The documents were obtained by Big Brother Watch, a civil rights and government watchdog group, in response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request. Network Rail, a body within the Department of Transportation which manages most of the country’s train network, has been overseeing the surveillance project.&nbsp;“The rollout and normalization of AI surveillance in these public spaces, without much consultation and conversation, is quite a concerning step,” Jake Hurfurt, head of research and investigations at Big Brother Watch,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-ai-cameras-emotions-uk-train-passengers/">told</a> Wired.As of now, the surveillance systems do not use facial recognition technology, which analyzes faces and matches them against facial images stored in certain databases.

Mirror, mirror on the wall, what’s the safest shot of all?

Gates-funded policy center seeks to undermine the experiences of millions, rename VAERS as Vaccine Safety Sentinel

Related Articles

Study provides more evidence COVID shots harmed male fertility

Japanese Health Ministry starts publishing COVID-shot death figures

Another Bank of America employee dies suddenly

Red Cross says blood from mRNA recipients is safe. What does the science say?

Latest Articles

Who's afraid of Big Bad Tech?

British taxpayers cheer vigilante group destroying climate cams

Electric car company files bankruptcy as EV market folds

UK tests emotion recognition cameras in train stations