Australia’s budget for vaccine injury compensation is expected to jump to $50 million (A$77 million) by July 2023, <a href="https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/federal-budget/covid-vaccine-injury-payouts-explode-to-77-million-budget-reveals/news-story/df39fcf430c6cadb487a9914df7a3422" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">according</a> to news.com.au.&nbsp;Under the current program run by Services Australia, an Australian injured by the COVID-19 injection must first prove the injury by presenting a signed letter from a doctor showing a causal link between the injection and the injury. There are not many injuries covered under the program; only a few, such as myocarditis, are recognized as vaccine injuries. Once an injury claim has been approved, the victim can claim medical costs, lost wages and other expenses, though compensation is capped at $13,000.&nbsp;For the 2021-2022 fiscal year, Services Australia budgeted $609,000 which, if every claimant received the maximum compensation, would max out at 47 people.&nbsp;But the new budget amount of $50 million could provide the maximum compensation to nearly 4,000 people.&nbsp;So far, only 59 out of 2,987 Australians who have claimed COVID-19 vaccine injuries have been compensated – approximately 2%. If that approval rate continues and the new compensation budget is distributed among 4,000 victims maximum, Australia could expect at least 200,000 injury complaints.&nbsp;The vaccine injury program is set to expire on April 17, 2024.&nbsp;Australia&nbsp;was one of the most fanatical countries when it came to the COVID-19 injections. The government created a <a href="https://www.health.gov.au/news/spread-freedom">Spread Freedom campaign</a>, in which Australian citizens could buy back their freedom with each vaccine dose they had injected.&nbsp;In September 2021 Australian Premier Scott Morris <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9972059/Covid-19-Australia-Roadmap-freedom-fully-vaccinated-NSW-residents-revealed.html">promised</a> citizens that if 70% of the country took both injections, he would allow up to five&nbsp;fully vaccinated people to gather in the home and up to 20 people to congregate outdoors.&nbsp;“Our roadmap outlines the freedoms that twice vaccinated people will enjoy once we reach 70 per cent double dose which means a meal with loved ones or a drink with friends is just around the corner,” teased Deputy Premier John Barilaro last year.&nbsp;Even before the injections came to market,&nbsp;Australia shocked the world with its heavy-handed response to COVID-19, which included beating anti-mandate protesters who violated some of the harshest restrictions outside China. Along with lockdown orders over a single COVID case, the Australian government developed a mobile app which required those in quarantine to provide proof of their location within 15 minutes.&nbsp;In August 2021 the New South Wales Council <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/rescue-dogs-shot-dead-by-nsw-council-due-to-covid-19-restrictions-20210821-p58ksh.html">shot dead</a> several rescue dogs so that volunteers from an animal shelter would not travel to pick them up.&nbsp;

iStock-1307900191.jpg

World News

Vaccine Injury

Only 59 out of 2,987 Australians claiming COVID vaccine injuries compensated

Australia’s vaccine injury compensation budget expected to rocket 80-fold

<h1>ACLU wins, someone loses</h1>The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is often mistaken for being a protector of individual rights although its very name distinctly references not personal freedoms but civil liberties. The ACLU, in fact, is now attempting to nullify laws banning sex change surgeries on minors, which would diminish individual parental rights as Child Protective Services (CPS) may obtain a court order mandating gender surgeries, against parental wishes, in any state not banning the procedure or by CPS moving a child to a state that allows gender surgeries. &nbsp;<h2>Civil rights vs civil liberties</h2>In practice, the ACLU builds legal cases around both civil liberties and civil rights, the difference between them is <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/civil_liberties" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">summarized</a> by Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute as follows:<blockquote><ul><li>Civil liberties are constitutionally protected freedoms.</li><li>Civil rights are&nbsp;claims built upon legislation.&nbsp;</li></ul></blockquote>In either case, the freedoms are understood to be those granted by the government, not automatically conferred upon a person. So even civil liberties may, ultimately, limit freedom. Civil rights are even further removed from individual rights, though, as they are generally based on legislated “group rights” which, by their very enforcement, impinge upon the individual rights of those not belonging to the preferred group.&nbsp;<h2>Government granted rights</h2>Becky Akers, a privacy expert and American Revolution historian, writing for The New American, <a href="https://thenewamerican.com/opinion/another-wrong-for-civil-rights/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">explains</a> the conflict between civil rights and individual rights.<blockquote>Despite its reputation for having freed minorities from bigots’ oppression, civil rights does exactly what its name implies: it robs the individual of his liberty on behalf of the State (“civil” derives from the Latin “civis,” meaning “citizen or townsman” — not a person in his own right but as he relates to his fellow subjects under a ruler). No wonder every government in America, from townships and villages to the Feds, obsesses over “civil rights” and spurns liberty: the former empowers them while the latter elevates us. (This also explains your instinctual distrust of the American Civil Liberties Union — even when it’s right.) [Emphases added.]</blockquote>As Akers notes, the ACLU occasionally gets it right, protecting citizens from government excess in violation of the Bill of Rights, a set of distinctly individual rights. The ACLU cannot be counted on to protect those rights in all cases, though, as when it <a href="https://www.aclu.org/documents/second-amendment" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fails to support</a> the individual right to defend oneself as defined by the Second Amendment.<blockquote>[T]he ACLU will not oppose governmental regulation of firearms as long as such regulation is reasonably related to a legitimate governmental interest, such as protection of the public health, safety, or welfare. Deference should be given to legislative judgments limiting gun ownership or use so that state and local governments are allowed an opportunity to experiment with solutions to the complex problems involving guns.</blockquote><h2>Versus inalienable rights</h2>Such infringement of the Second Amendment would not be possible were the right to means of self-defense considered so fundamental that it need not be enumerated. Alexander Hamilton, writing in <a href="https://csac.history.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/281/2017/07/Publius_84.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Federalist 84</a>, argued against adopting any part of the Bill of Rights, preferring to leave those rights to be self-understood:<blockquote>I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and in the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colourable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? [Emphases added.]</blockquote><a href="http://www.edslaw.net/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rabbi E. David Smith, Esq.</a> analyzes the origin of the American conception of inalienable rights:<blockquote>The American conception of individual rights and liberties accords with the Biblical view that by the very Creation of a man “in the image of G-d," people have inalienable rights no matter where or when they live. &nbsp;Civil rights and liberties, on the other hand, are bestowed upon the resident of the "civic" (the city or state) by the "civic" and those rights can be taken away by the "civic" and only apply while in the place that granted them. [Emphases added.]</blockquote><h2>Civil rights favor one, marginalize the other</h2>Akers goes on to analyze how advocating for civil rights, a role the ACLU often takes opens the door for the “State’s endless meddling in our lives":<blockquote>“Civil rights” is an actual philosophy, not just a pastime for strung-out, unkempt Marxists still hallucinating about the 1960’s. And it is liberty’s opposite in every way, from its premises to its conclusions. Like its Progressive cousin, it sees the State not as our worst enemy but as our best friend — or, more accurately, as God: omniscient, omnipotent (not just in fact but in ability as well, since government can fix all problems, even those of the human heart), and protective of all its children.Those dependents have little identity apart from the State; they are “citizens,” not individuals. Everything is political, with the private sector so despised and anemic it might as well not exist; everyone is a member of one or more groups, whose “rights” conflict with others — a welcome result, you see, because it guarantees the God-State’s endless meddling in our lives. [Emphases added.]</blockquote><h3>Harvard doesn't have unlimited spots</h3>Thus, when one group of people obtain extra rights, those who are not members of the preferred group are at risk of having their rights diminished. Thus, when civil rights groups like the ACLU attempt to use activist judges <a href="https://www.aclu.org/cases/schuette-v-coalition-defend-affirmative-action?redirect=cpredirect%2F34588#press-releases" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">to nullify</a> state constitutional amendments banning affirmative action, individuals lacking a special “group status” lose opportunities for education, employment, promotion, and more.&nbsp;In pushing for racial factors to be considered in education, the ACLU even <a href="https://www.aclu.org/news/racial-justice/what-you-need-to-know-about-affirmative-action-at-the-supreme-court" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">laments</a> that, in the absence of affirmative action, race would be irrelevant:<blockquote>If the court strikes down affirmative action — also known as race-conscious admissions policies — it would make it unconstitutional for universities across the country to consider a student’s race as one factor in a holistic admissions review process. [Emphasis added.]</blockquote>For each student whose overall score gets bumped over the line for admission with the points assigned to their race, another student who doesn't benefit from race points becomes excluded.<h3>Can't have two gold medal winners</h3>More recently, the ACLU has <a href="https://apnews.com/article/connecticut-transgender-student-athletes-7eb2139f083a699bc02de3f" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">advocated </a>for the group rights of biological males claiming female status supersede the rights of biological females, nullifying biological females' rights to have sports competitors limited to members of their own biological sex:<blockquote>Opponents of Connecticut’s policy letting transgender girls compete in girls high school sports will get a second chance to challenge it in court, an appeals court ruled . . .The American Civil Liberties Union said it welcomes a chance to defend the rights of the two transgender high school track runners it represents. [Emphases added.]</blockquote>To state the obvious, if either biological male takes the gold, a biological female will not.<h2>Parental rights in medical decisions</h2>When a minor child receives positive feedback from teachers&nbsp;in government schools for agreeing to identify as transgender and are then referred to the schools' guidance counselors who recommend gender transition procedures, individual parents may lose the right to make such decisions for their children to government actors.&nbsp;The Washington Free Beacon <a href="https://freebeacon.com/democrats/aclu-targets-anti-woke-medical-group-do-no-harm/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">reported</a> on the ACLU's advocacy of the transgender activists:<blockquote>The American Civil Liberties Union has a new target in its fight to uphold transgender surgeries for minors: Do No Harm, the anti-woke medical group that opposes identity politics in the medical field.On Monday, the ACLU sent a public records request to Missouri Republican lawmaker Andrew Koenig regarding the state's SAFE Act, the 2023 law that bars doctors from performing transgender surgeries on minors. The request, a copy of which was obtained by the Washington Free Beacon, seeks communications between Missouri lawmakers and a number of activist groups, including Do No Harm, that reference the law and other transgender-related terms, such as "sex reassignment surgery," "sex change," and "gender transition."The request marks the latest attempt from the ACLU to beat back laws in red states outlawing sex change surgeries and other transgender treatments for minors. The ACLU sued to block the SAFE Act last year but failed, prompting the law to go into effect in August. The nonprofit has challenged similar bills in Texas and Idaho, and it has also targeted state laws that bar biological men from competing in women's sports. [Emphases added.]</blockquote>If the ACLU succeeds, there could be more cases like that of Krista and Todd Kolstad, who not only lost custody of their minor biological daughter for refusing to transition her but saw <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/01/30/news/montana-parents-lose-custody-of-daughter-after-opposing-transition-report/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CPS move her</a> out of Montana, where gender surgeries on minors are <a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/04/28/1172881782/montana-ban-gender-affirming-care-trans-minors-signed" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">illegal</a>, to Wyoming, where they are allowed. The couple even faces <a href="http://The parents have spoken publicly about what happened with their daughter in violation of a judge's order for them to remain silent about the case. In an interview this week with The Christian Post, Krista Kolstad said the couple learned from a legal source that they would likely be arrested upon returning to Montana. " target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">arrest</a> for violating a gag order by talking about their situation publicly.<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">BREAKING The Montana family who lost custody of their teen daughter after objecting to her "gender transition" have now been told they are facing arrest. Krista and Todd Kolstad were previously ordered not to speak about their family's ordeal.<a href="https://t.co/FUTphcoF81">https://t.co/FUTphcoF81</a>— REDUXX (@ReduxxMag) <a href="https://twitter.com/ReduxxMag/status/1754506355434545507?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div>Thanks in part to the ACLU, such cases of the government overruling the traditional rights of individual parents to raise their children as they see fit, and arranging irreversible gender surgeries for their children, are becoming more common, even as studies <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/11/the-link-between-autism-and-trans-identity/507509/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">show</a> autistic children to be over-represented among the transgender and thus more likely to undergo those surgeries while both a minor and intellectually challenged.&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">This is terrifying and disgusting. Autistic children, including those with intellectual disabilities, will be sterilised and mutilated by puberty blockers, wrong sex hormones and 'gender affirming' surgeries and Dr Strang sees that as 'positive'. <a href="https://t.co/yJ88SZgg8W">https://t.co/yJ88SZgg8W</a>— Gender Critical Autistics (@GCAutistic) <a href="https://twitter.com/GCAutistic/status/1686980255939010560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 3, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div><h3>Parental rights in education</h3>The ACLU has a long history of interfering with parental decision-making, as when it <a href="https://www.aclu.org/about/aclu-history" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">created</a> a legal case to challenge the wishes, codified into law, of the elected legislators of Tennessee to teach their children that the Lord created Adam and Eve, the first people, in accord with the Biblical account of creation, and were therefore not evolved from animals:<blockquote>One of the ACLU’s earliest battles was the Scopes Trial of 1925. When the state of Tennessee passed a law banning the teaching of evolution, the ACLU recruited biology teacher John T. Scopes to challenge the law by teaching the banned subject in his class. When Scopes was eventually prosecuted, the ACLU partnered with celebrated attorney Clarence Darrow to defend him.</blockquote>Till today, those parents telling their children that the Lord was a partner in their creation will be contradicted by an ACLU-backed biology syllabus, eroding the individual rights of parents to parent their children in favor of the rights of a “protected group,” in this case atheists opposing the Biblical account of Creation.As with all protected groups enjoying special rights, someone loses - when the atheists win control over taxpayer-funded education, God-fearing parents lose control over how their own money is used to “educate” their own children.When individual liberties are not respected and protected, rights become precarious — group rights take precedence over individual rights, and liberties can be removed by an activist judiciary. &nbsp;&nbsp;<h4>Related Articles:</h4><ol><li><a href="http://frontline.news/post/cps-at-the-door-let-them-in">CPS at the door; let them in?</a></li><li><a href="https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/medical-kidnapping-canceled-child-blinded-and-brain-damaged-by-forced-hospital-treatment-returned-to-parents-after-frontline-news-inquiry">Medical kidnapping canceled; Child blinded and brain damaged by forced hospital treatment returned to parents after Frontline News inquiry</a></li><li><a href="https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/medical-kidnapping-cps-pretext-to-investigate-medical-freedom-activist-rabbi-exposed">Medical kidnapping: CPS pretext to investigate medical freedom activist rabbi exposed</a></li><li><a href="https://aflds.org/news/post/baby-cyrus-returned-to-parents-after-frontline-news-inquiry-to-cps/">Baby Cyrus returned to parents after Frontline News inquiry to CPS</a></li><li><a href="https://www.frontline.news/post/across-the-nation-cps-forces-chemo-on-cancer-free-children">Across the nation, CPS forces chemo on cancer-free children</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/christians-excluded-from-socialist-wars-of-national-liberation">Christians excluded from socialist 'Wars of National Liberation'</a></li><li><a href="https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/klaus-schwabs-gay-supremacist-advisor-tries-to-attack-religion">Klaus Schwab's gay supremacist advisor tries to attack religion</a></li><li><a href="https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/cps-kidnapping-rabbi-providing-religious-vaccine-exemptions-threatened">CPS kidnapping: Rabbi providing religious vaccine exemptions threatened</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/government-used-love-your-neighbor-theology-financial-pressure-to-coerce-religious-leaders-on-vaccines">Government used 'love your neighbor' theology, financial pressure to coerce religious leaders on vaccines</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/fact-check-did-uk-police-order-christian-woman-to-stop-singing-the-gospel">Fact Check: Did UK police order Christian woman to stop singing the gospel?</a></li></ol>

ACLU.jpeg

US News

Legal News

Civil rights used to quash personal freedoms

ACLU targets individual rights  

Constitution being burned.jpg

China, Bill Gates, and Pharma using WHO to target American society

The Constitution's last stand?

China and WHO ball vs USA 3.jpg

The WHO's China backed aim to curtail your freedom and redistribute your money

Don’t just reject the Pandemic Treaty – Get US Out! Of the WHO 

<h2>The greatest threat to democracy yet</h2>Representative Chris Smith (R-NJ) held a press conference on Capitol Hill on Monday, standing alongside other congressional representatives and policy experts, to let the American people know that the WHO's proposed Pandemic Treaty represents what he believes to be the greatest threat to democracy yet, as <a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/rep-chris-smith-warns-who-pandemic-treaty-is-the-greatest-threat-to-freedom-in-human-history/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">reported</a> by Lifesite News.The New American <a href="https://thenewamerican.com/us/healthcare/house-presser-whos-pandemic-treaty-would-crush-u-s-sovereignty/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">reported</a> on the extent of the threat as viewed by Smith and his colleagues:<blockquote>On Monday, Representative Chris Smith (R-N.J.) hosted a press conference dedicated to the Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) proposed and currently negotiated by the World Health Organization (WHO). The documents were dubbed “the greatest single threat to the sovereignty of our constitutional republic.” [Emphasis added.]</blockquote>The problems with the treaty that he and others described include its potential impact on the individual freedoms of U.S. citizens, the fact that it would have made no difference to the outcome of the COVID-19 pandemic had it been in effect then, and that the term “shall,” used 175 times in the treaty, makes all aspects of it mandatory and not voluntary, a power grab by the WHO. These issues, among others, were identified in his office's press release:[fn]“Panel of Experts Raises the Alarm on Growing Concerns Surrounding Looming WHO ‘Pandemic Treaty.’” U.S. Congressman Chris Smith, 6 Feb. 2024, <a href="https://chrissmith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=411866" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://chrissmith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=411866</a>.[/fn]<blockquote>. . . lack of transparency, the backroom negotiations, WHO overreach and infringement on US sovereignty, unknown financial obligations for US taxpayers, threats to intellectual property rights and free speech, funding for abortion, and how the treaty will benefit China at the expense of the United States.. . .There is no provision in this treaty that . . . had [it] been in effect in 2019 it would have in anyway made a substantive difference in preventing or ameliorating the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic . . .This is a global power grab using any future emergency as a justification to use that power, . . . At risk is national sovereignty…the term ‘shall’ appears over 175 times in the document. In legal parlance, ‘shall’ is mandatory; it is a command. This is anything but a voluntary agreement. [Emphases added.]</blockquote><div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ERnFjULhz54?si=_f7AVA-zhTXdaXU_&amp;start=38" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>In addition, the treaty would force nations to provide for their citizens all health care services that the WHO deems “essential.” Currently, it considers abortions an “essential service” even though many states do not allow abortions. As Smith explained, this could easily include gender mutilation surgeries if the WHO decided it was an essential health service:&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Rep. Chris Smith warns <a href="https://twitter.com/WHO?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@WHO</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/pandemic?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#pandemic</a> treaty is the greatest threat to <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/freedom?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#freedom</a> in human history READ MORE: <a href="https://t.co/aDizOsAa1G">https://t.co/aDizOsAa1G</a> <a href="https://t.co/NbfLFATA4A">pic.twitter.com/NbfLFATA4A</a>— LifeSiteNews (@LifeSite) <a href="https://twitter.com/LifeSite/status/1754905546283426126?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 6, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><h3>The Chinese agenda</h3>Additionally, the requirement for countries to provide whatever the WHO considers essential services may be used to force nations to abide by the WHO's political and/or social agenda, whether or not it is relevant to the people of a particular country and whether or not it is religiously and culturally objectionable, is practical or even makes biological sense. And that agenda forced on the world by the WHO may be the agenda of China - both the current head of the WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, who <a href="https://frontline.news/post/australian-parliamentarian-attacks-who-for-keeping-83-rapists-on-staff-all-answering-to-terrorist-chief" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">served</a> as minister in a terrorist organization and the former head, Margaret Chan, received their positions as the result of significant lobbying on their behalf by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The Family Research Council <a href="https://www.frc.org/updatearticle/20220525/who-china" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">summarized</a> Tedros' China ties:<blockquote>Tedros's ties to China are strong. During his tenure as Ethiopia's foreign minister from 2012 to 2016, he oversaw the borrowing of over $13 billion from China, which has led it to becoming Ethiopia's largest trading partner. China also "campaigned hard" for Tedros to become chief of the WHO in 2017. These concerns, along with Tedros's background as a member of the Marxist Tigrayan People's Liberation Front and the Biden administration's push to give WHO the ability to declare pandemic authority without the consent of member states, have led to strong opposition.</blockquote>For her part, Chan, born to a Chinese family in Hong Kong, was <a href="https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-margaret-chan-reshaped-the-who-and-brought-it-closer-to-china/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">handpicked</a> by then-Chinese President Hu Jintao to lead the WHO.&nbsp;<blockquote>More than 13 years before a new and deadly coronavirus began to spread across China, a Hong Kong-born doctor with a Canadian passport met Hu Jintao, then the president of China. Mr. Hu told Margaret Chan that Beijing was interested in her as a potential director-general of the World Health Organization.Never before had a Chinese person led a major United Nations organization.</blockquote><div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The Fall of the WHO didn’t happen overnight Both Dr. Margaret Chan &amp; Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus would not have been elected without the meddling of China. The WHO’s Director-General controls a large amount of public resource and plays a decisive role in the global medical… <a href="https://t.co/R2HcLnM9Qq">pic.twitter.com/R2HcLnM9Qq</a>— Joséphine (@Jojo99275148) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jojo99275148/status/1631491907619618817?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><h3>Power grab</h3>Smith's claim that the Pandemic Treaty is a power grab is supported by a 2021 <a href="https://frontline.news/post/emergency-response-or-planned-takeover-who-pandemic-treaty" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">statement</a> by Tedros saying that the treaty was designed to “empower” the WHO. The quest for power will likely continue even if the vote on the Pandemic Treaty fails as it began with Margaret Chan when she described her Marxist vision for radical social change.&nbsp;Check back as we look at the WHO's real agenda as outlined by Margaret Chan.Related articles:<ul><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/emergency-response-or-planned-takeover-who-pandemic-treaty">Emergency response or planned takeover? WHO Pandemic Treaty</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/who-vs-first-amendment-white-house-to-decide-by-may-on-ceding-authority-to-global-body">WHO vs First Amendment; White House to decide by May on ceding authority to global body</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/fact-check-does-leaked-who-document-reveal-scripted-answers-to-vaccine-deaths">Fact Check: Does leaked WHO document reveal hidden, scripted answers to vaccine deaths?</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/biden-may-bypass-senate-for-who-power-transfer">Biden may bypass Senate for WHO power transfer</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/senators-oppose-transfering-pandemic-powers-to-who">Senators oppose Biden transferring pandemic powers to WHO</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/46-senators-now-support-bill-requiring-senate-approval-for-who-pandemic-treaty">46 senators now support bill requiring senate approval for WHO pandemic 'treaty'</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/australian-parliamentarian-attacks-who-for-keeping-83-rapists-on-staff-all-answering-to-terrorist-chief">Australian Senator attacks WHO for keeping 83 rapists and molesters on staff, all answering to terrorist chief</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/senate-rejects-requirement-it-ratify-who-pandemic-treatyd">Senate won't force Biden to bring WHO Pandemic Treaty to vote</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/beholden-to-china-who-director-general-tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus-part-3">Beholden to China . . . WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus - Part 3</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/beholden-to-china-who-director-general-tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus-part-2">Beholden to China . . . WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus - Part 2</a></li><li><a href="https://frontline.news/post/beholden-to-china-who-director-general-tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus-part-1">Beholden to China . . . WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus - Part 1</a></li></ul>June 2023 WHO pandemic treaty negotiations:<ul><li><a href="https://www.who.int/news/item/17-06-2023-countries-set-out-way-forward-for-continued-negotiations-on-global-agreement-on-pandemic-prevention--preparedness--and-response" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Countries set out way forward for continued negotiations on global agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response</a></li><li><a href="" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">WHO INB (International Negotiating Board) session 1 - June 6, 2023</a></li><li><a href="https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/e/e_inb-5-resumed-session.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">WHO INB (International Negotiating Board) session 2 - June 6, 2023</a></li><li><a href="https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/e/e_inb-5-resumed-session.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">WHO INB (International Negotiating Board) closing session- June 16, 2023</a></li></ul>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Bursting democracy balloon with pandemic treaty.jpg

China

Could mandate gender mutilation surgeries if WHO declares them 'essential health service'

'Greatest single threat to the sovereignty of our constitutional republic' - Congressmen warn about WHO treaty

Australia’s vaccine injury compensation budget expected to rocket 80-fold

Only 59 out of 2,987 Australians claiming COVID vaccine injuries compensated

Related Articles

'Get US Out! Of the UN' - Birchers not surprised UN personnel participated in rape, massacre in Israel

Emergency response or planned takeover? WHO Pandemic Treaty

Orwellian? Federal officials roll out airport facial recognition technology with promise of 'strengthening privacy'

Roundup found to be 'defective cancer causing product;' Bayer to pay $2.25 billion verdict

Latest Articles

ACLU targets individual rights

The Constitution's last stand?

Don’t just reject the Pandemic Treaty – Get US Out! Of the WHO

'Greatest single threat to the sovereignty of our constitutional republic' - Congressmen warn about WHO treaty