The Susan B. Anthony List’s National Pro-Life Scorecard recently gave the vice-president its lowest ranking on issues pertaining to the protection of babies before and after birth:
Kamala Harris Gets “F” From Pro-Life Group After Voting for Infanticide and Abortions Up to Birth
Refusing medical care to abortion survivors or premature births is inconsistent with Christian theology. Yet, Harris attended church regularly and was even a member of the church choir.
[Harris’] mother . . . decided to ground her daughters in Christianity, sending them each Sunday with a family friend to attend Oakland’s 23rd Avenue Church of God, a denomination with Pentecostal roots, where they sang in the children’s choir.
The only logical conclusion is that Harris’s support of infanticide comes despite, not because of, her Christian upbringing.
Dr. Bernard Nathanson, raised in a Jewish, but non-observant home, earned the nickname “abortion king” after founding the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL), helping repeal New York’s law against “elective” abortions and then overseeing more than 75,000 of them.
When ultrasound technology advanced in the 1970s and he was able to see a fetus “shrinking away from abortion tools,” he came to the conclusion that the fetuses felt pain, stopped performing abortions and began showing a film of the fetus’ pain reactions, The Silent Scream, and eventually dropped his atheism.
Like Harris, (initially) Nathanson pushed abortion despite, not because of, his religious background. In fact, the Jewish Bible expressly prohibits abortion:
Whoever sheds the blood of a person within a person - his blood shall be shed, for in the image of God He made man. Genesis 9:6.
The same Jewish Bible also prohibits homosexuality, promiscuity and immodesty, protects private property rights, and demands the observance of the Sabbath as a display of belief in the six days of Creation and God's rest on the seventh day. It is thus not surprising that religious Jews were the main target of both the international socialists of the Soviet Union and the national socialists of Germany.
Equally unsurprising, Jews who follow biblical commandments like eating kosher and observing the Sabbath as a day of rest also vote conservatively - 83% of Orthodox Jews voted for President Trump in 2020, compared to just 20% of non-observant Jews. Thus, non-observant George Soros, who was raised by a “quite anti-Semitic” mother “ashamed of being Jewish,” famously attacks conservative values while the Sabbath observant Dennis Prager champions them.
Splitting the Right
Socialist promises of prosperity often meet resistance from a populace frightened by risks of reduced freedom, economic downturns, and even famine. Rabbi Marvin Antelman explains that, for that very reason, fomenting internal conflict has been a communist strategy to convince people that the stability offered by the status quo is no longer desirable.
A characteristic of the divide and conquer psychology of the Communist movement has been its ability to instigate divisiveness among groups.
Over the years it has fomented revolution by accentuating differences between Blacks and Whites, Asiatics and Occidentals, youth and elders, landlords and tenants, Christians and Jews, Moslems and Christians and with the advent of Women's Lib between men and women, even husband and wife. [P.17].
Jews not welcome (in conservative circles)
One such attempt to sow disunity among would be opponents of revolutionaries was the distribution of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a 1903 book purporting to reveal the plans of Jews to enslave the rest of mankind. Its wide circulation meant that Jews would be unwelcome in conservative political movements and, at the same time, made Jews anxious of conservative Gentiles, despite having the most to lose in a Left wing revolution.
At the same time, according to Antelman, non-believing Jews were specifically chosen by the Left to hold prominent positions so that Jews could be blamed for the harms caused by their policies.
. . . they found them most suited to their ends, as the Communists or the CFR [Council on Foreign Relations] elitists of today do, to utilize . . . these Jewish-born apostates. They were especially placed in conspicuous positions so as to insure a victory of sorts if they would not succeed—thus polarizing among the masses those who would be stupid enough to blame the Jews for Illuminism, Revolution, Bundism, Socialism or Communism. [p. 28].
God fearing Jews, on the other hand, find each of those revolutionary movements abhorrent. The famous twelfth century physician and Jewish leader Maimonides ends his 14 volume encyclopedia of Jewish law with a clear dictum that Jews are not to seek dominion over other nations even after the coming of the Messiah.
The Sages and the prophets did not yearn for the Messianic era in order to have dominion over the entire world, to rule over the gentiles, to be exalted by the nations, or to eat, drink, and celebrate. Rather, they desired to be free to involve themselves in Torah and wisdom without any pressures or disturbances, so that they would merit the world to come …
Gilbert connected to “The Protocols”
Robert Beadles, a “close ally” of Joey Gilbert who personally funded an election recount to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars for Gilbert, heavily promotes The Protocols, according to an exposé by The Nevada Independent, which included a recording of Beadles stating:
I always go back to the document from 1905, the learned ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion,’ . . . It's based and founded on hundreds, if not thousands, of years of tactics on how you overthrow governments and how you would do exactly this: Layer yourself in every part of government to essentially destroy it from within.
The exposé went on to describe the extent of Gilbert’s ally’s invocation, and defense, of The Protocols.
. . . an underlying theme in many of his writings and communications is an intense focus on the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”. . . . Beadles discussed the “Protocols” in at least 12 livestreams last year, often bringing the subject up multiple times. He even urged listeners to read the “Protocols” for themselves in another video stream from January 2021 and dismissed evidence that they are fabrications.
An internet search does not reveal any response of Joey Gilbert to this exposé of Beadles, Gilbert’s “close ally” and financier, as a backer of an obvious forgery that hurts the conservative cause.
Which team is Gilbert on?
In addition to sowing disunity on the Right, references to the obviously fraudulent Protocols by Right wingers discredits genuine beliefs of the Right, pushing others to doubt even proven facts. In fact, The Nevada Independent did just that in their exposé on Beadles and his close relationship with Gilbert. The article jumps from Beadle’s (legitimate) belief in widespread election fraud to his extensive reliance on (forged) Protocols, to his (legitimate) opposition to COVID tyranny. One exposed exclusively to legacy media is thus given the message to lump all three positions together as misinformation.
None of these problems that the Protocols cause for the Right were enough for Gilbert to distance himself from his Protocols promoting “close ally.”
Playing into the “hands of the enemy”
Antelman points out that promotion of the Protocols also helps the Left by making it easy for them to attack anyone claiming that elitists are pushing for world government, since Leftists could simply respond, “you got that from the Protocols hoax.” In fact, what makes the Protocols a forgery is that when Sergei Nilus, the monk tasked by Czar Nicholas II with writing a screed that would turn Russian citizenry against Jews in general and against his political rivals, the Schiff, Warburg and Rothschild banking families, in particular, Nilus simply plagiarized earlier books evidencing a conspiracy by non-practicing “born” Christians and “born” Jews to undermine both sovereign government and their own religions by subverting the morals of people, putting bankers in control of the world's economies, and controlling the press.
Nilus simply limited the bad actors to those of Jewish heritage, and claimed to have had access to the minutes of a late-19th-century meeting of Jewish leaders from around the world (the "Elders of Zion"). Thus, the involved bankers became exclusively Jewish, as did those pushing immorality. But the original works made clear that the conspirators were generally Gentiles. For example, many of the ideas of the Protocols were first publicized by Professor John Robison, a British physicist and mathematician, entitled,
Proofs of a Conspiracy against all the Religions and Governments of Europe, carried on in the Secret Meetings of Free-Masons, Illuminati and Reading Societies.
The Protocols changed the “Secret Meetings of Free-Masons, Illuminati and Reading Societies,” many of which did not even allow Jews to join, to “The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion,” (the full title of the book). Robison’s book mentions Jews only four times, once to document how conspirators attempt to defile the “pure morality of the Jews and Chriftians [Old Eng. sp.].” [p.33].
Similarly, some 160 passages from the Protocols were plagiarized from the political satire Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, in which Napoleon III, represented by the non-Jewish character Machiavelli, conspires to create a one-world government under his rule.
Not surprisingly, when the book had its day in court, a Christian judge in Bern, Switzerland, Walter Meyer, ruled The Protocols to be a forgery, plagiarism and "obscene literature," adding,
I hope the time will come when nobody will be able to understand how in 1935 nearly a dozen sane and responsible men [representatives of Nazis who made pogrom-style speeches while selling The Protocols] were able for two weeks to mock the intellect of the Bern court discussing the authenticity of the so-called Protocols, the very Protocols that, harmful as they have been and will be, are nothing but laughable nonsense."
Antelman concludes that The Protocols succeeded only in taking discussion of the threat posed by a New World Order off the table.
[The Czar] dispensed the staggering sum of thirteen million rubles [for the writing and distribution of The Protocols.] . . . Ironically, the Czar only hurt his cause, and he allowed his blind, savage hatred for the Jews to play into the hands of his enemies, because now those committed to the concept of a conspiracy to undermine world governments and religions could immediately be labeled as bigots and could be discredited.
The truth of the matter was . . . that there was a conspiracy, but it was neither Jewish, nor Catholic nor Masonic. It involved people of all types of religious and national backgrounds. Side by side with the Schiffs, Warburgs and Rothschilds were the Morgans and the Rockefellers. With Trotsky were Lenin and Stalin. [p. xviii].
Joey Gilbert’s schemes, sanctions, reprimands, suspensions, political grifting, attack on Trump and assistance to illegals evading ICE are documented here:
- AFLDS founder again tyrannized in staged embezzlement
- Trojan horse infiltrating America's Frontline Doctors previously found guilty of cheating
- Attorney attempting America's Frontline Doctors takeover faces reprimand
- Joey Gilbert sanctioned ¼ million dollars for frivolous lawsuit
- ‘Political grifter Joey Gilbert donates to radical Democrats’
- Joey Gilbert tips off illegals ahead of raids but campaigns on ‘seal the border’
- Joey Gilbert ‘had nothing to do with anti-mask rallies;’ pushed masks
- Attorney attempting AFLDS takeover caught accepting funding from Democrats
- Joey Gilbert exposed: Left-wing politics; gun control, high taxes, more regs, illegal immigration
- Joey Gilbert attacks Trump; ‘encouraged breach’ of president's Vegas Hotel
- Putrefied Stew: Conservative media personality Stew Peters falls prey to MSM-style slapstick journalism
More to come
Check back as we continue our series on Gilbert and look at these questions:
- How has Gilbert tried to replace the doctor who founded AFLDS with non-doctors?
- Why is Gilbert taking money from AFLDS donors while not developing any programming or activities?
- What sanctions do the Professional Conduct Rules provide for attorneys committing perjury?