Frontline News

Narratives for Sale: Donors buying up media to push agenda

Nonprofits attacking US energy have ties to Russian interests

Daniel Turner, Real Clear Energy

Jun 04, 2023

|

12:51 PM

The destructive leak of US intelligence documents once again highlights the extent Russia is placing informational warfare front and center in its approach to conflicts of the 21st century. And with questions continuing to circulate about financial ties between Russian interests and many radical green organizations in the US, it’s worth scrutinizing how these groups are adapting their tactics to influence media coverage in an age of unaffordable gas prices and frustration with President Biden’s failed energy policies.

Radical green groups are scooping up reporters to become full-time propagandists for their cause, using their connections and credentials to legitimize false attacks and undermine American energy production. The Associated Press announced a “donation” to fund the salaries of 20 journalists who would push climate change stories.  As many media organizations are forced to shed staff, they are cleverly filling the void with misinformation that’s being presented as unbiased journalism in mainstream outlets.

Take the example of the group Floodlight, which advertises itself as a “nonprofit newsroom that investigates the powerful interests stalling climate action” and employs a sizable team of “journalists.” Despite openly touting a biased and one-sided agenda, its work attacking American energy companies is published as news articles — not opinion — in publications like The Guardian, The Texas Tribune, NPR, and the Los Angeles Times. The disclosed donors all share Floodlight’s radical mission of “stopping oil and gas at the source” across the US. 

The deeper you dig into Floodlight’s funding, the more troubling patterns emerge. In recent years, filings with Bermuda’s registrar of companies revealed that Klein Ltd, a company “run by executives with deep ties to Russian oil interests and offshore money laundering schemes involving members of President Vladimir Putin’s inner circle,” funneled $23 million to the Sea Change Foundation. At the time, the massive gift to this radical green group that provides grants to “nonprofit organizations focused on climate change” was the company’s “only publicly documented” activity. This bombshell revelation has been the subject of numerous calls for investigation by leading members of Congress. 

It doesn’t require much investigation to reveal Floodlight’s close ties to the Sea Change Foundation. One of Floodlight’s most significant donors, the Tides Foundation, has received at least $4 million from the Sea Change foundation. Another major supporter of Floodlight, the Heising-Simons Foundation, is run by Liz Simon — the sister of Nathaniel Simons who founded and runs the Sea Change foundation. The Sea Change foundation has also contributed an eye-popping $125 million to the Energy Foundation, which in turn has given at least $8 million to Floodlight donors. Given these established ties, Floodlight’s repeated attacks on American LNG companies that are posed to replace Russian supply in Europe will inevitably raise eyebrows. 

Russian misinformation campaigns targeting energy producers in Western countries are nothing new. In 2016, the Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies published a report detailing how the Russian government funneled “€82 million in NGOs whose job is to persuade EU governments to stop shale gas exploration,” through funding that was “complex and hidden from the public eye. Leaked emails from 2014 have revealed that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton believed Russia was funding “phony environmental groups” in the US. 

Russia has a long history of propagandizing media coverage in foreign countries. Most famously, Russia funded Russia Today — a state news channel that operates across the globe to spread their propaganda. With Russia Today now being taken off the airwaves in many countries, including the US, it stands to reason that Russia would adapt to more covert tactics to spread the message.

As the war in Ukraine grinds on and Russia cozies up to China, the tactics of the Kremlin are more than just interesting fodder for investigators: they are an urgent matter of national security.

It is not illegal to take foreign money. It is, however, illegal to hide it from the American people and mask journalism or advocacy as mere differences in domestic policy.  Since 1938 groups taking foreign money to advance another nation’s agenda have had to register as foreign agents. It’s time for the Congress to call hearings on these type groups and ask the simple question: whose side are you on?

The American people deserve to know whether our media coverage is being unduly influenced by adversaries who seek to weaken us. It’s time we demand Congress and even the Department of Justice slap the label of “foreign agent” on groups that use our sacred First Amendment rights to push the agenda of another country.

This article was originally published by Real Clear Energy and is republished here with permission 

Latest Articles

Frontline News - Logo
  • Frontline News
  • Breaking News
  • Radio

Follow us on

PRIVACY POLICY